We Know When Trump Will Be Sentenced in Hush Money Case
Nobody Trusts the FBI
Turns Out Trump Had More to Do With Speaker Mike Johnson's Victory Than...
The Main Takeaway From Judge Merchan's Latest Decision Regarding Trump's 'Hush Money' Case
Gallup Poll Shows How Majority of Americans Feel About Trump's Immigration Plans
BREAKING: House Decides Mike Johnson’s Fate As Speaker
REPORT: Mexican Immigration Officials Helping Illegals Enter US Through Taxi Scheme
The Legacy of Jimmy Carter
Here's What Republicans Are Saying About Mike Johnson's Speakership Win
Border Patrol Issues a Grim Warning to Migrants Ahead of Inauguration Day
Trump Responds to Biden Giving Award to Liz Cheney
Is Attorney General Letitia James for Real With This Take After the Queens...
Bernie Sanders: ‘Elon Musk Is Wrong’ About H-1B Visas
Where Will KJP Go Next? Some Say She's 'Unemployable.'
John Thune Lays Out a Top Priority for the Senate, and Democrats Sure...
Tipsheet

Heh: Anti-ID Dems Required Rigorous Verification Process For DNC Chairmanship Vote Count

As you're already aware, President Obama's hard-left Labor Secretary was elected DNC Chairman over the weekend, narrowly beating out an even harder-left candidate backed by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. The final ballots ended up being tallied by hand after the DNC's wifi failed (cue Russia jokes here), leading to this pronouncement from acting Chairwoman Donna Brazile, who stressed the importance of safeguarding the legitimacy of the vote count. Via the Free Beacon, this sounds an awful lot like Democrats' capacious and demagogic definition of "voter suppression" to me:

Advertisement
"Pursuant to the rules of procedure, the chair has the discretion as to the voting mechanism. It is my determination, based on the system that we tested this morning, that I would like to use paper ballots. And I'll tell you why. We have to make sure that we can not just count the ballots but verify every name and signature...And I want to make sure that at the conclusion of all of our votes, that you, the members of this party, will be able to review those ballots."

Verifying names and signatures?  Sounds like they're trying to "disenfranchise" potential voters, or whatever.  One wonders if the Democrats required photo identification to enter this meeting (as they have for other party gatherings in the past), or if they permitted just anyone to wander in.  The Left has a storied history of hypocrisy and confusing logic in regards to the allegedly burdensome requirement to produce photo identification in various forums, including at polling stations.  It's always worth repeating that a lopsided, bipartisan, cross-racial majority of Americans favor voter ID laws, which have been upheld as constitutional by the US Supreme Court.  Though certain broad claims of widespread vote fraud are irresponsible and baseless, illegal voting is absolutely a real phenomenon, and most people agree that modest measures to protect the integrity of the electoral process are appropriate.  In case you missed it, I'll leave you with the Trump administration's abandoning of its predecessor's legal fight to combat Texas' common-sense law:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement