Kash Patel Did What? Did The Atlantic Publish Another Fake News Piece Again?
Good News: These Two Supreme Court Justices Are NOT Retiring
I'm Sure Republicans Were Happy to Hear This News Regarding Their 2026 Midterm...
Watch CNBC's Joe Kernen Wreck Hakeem Jeffries' Anti-Trump Talking Points Over the Economy
The Dems' Virginia Redistricting Push Still in Limbo As Election Day Nears
Look at Scott Jennings' Face When Kamala Harris Former Comms Director Said This...
Man Who Threw Molotov Cocktail at OpenAI CEO's Home Referenced Luigi Mangione
Iran Plays With Fire After Resuming Strait of Hormuz Blockade
Colorado's Religious Freedom Is a Rocky Mountain Lie
Trump Signs Executive Order to Fast-Track Psychedelic Treatments for Mental Illness
This Radio Chatter From the Iranian Attack on an Oil Tanker Is Crazy
ISIS Propagandist Who Called for 'Lone Wolf' Attacks Sentenced to 25 Years
The Iranians Are at It Again in the Strait of Hormuz
Deplorable Democrat Lawfare Just Came for This Trump Attorney
The End of the Charade: IOC Enforces Biology in Women's Sports and Restores...
Tipsheet

Report: Inadequate Security at "Decrepit" US Embassy...in Beirut

Report: Inadequate Security at "Decrepit" US Embassy...in Beirut


Echoes of pre-attack Benghazi.  What could go wrong?  The Washington Guardian reports: 

The State Department is failing to adequately protect U.S. diplomats in Beirut, leaving them without necessary counterterrorism training and serving in a decrepit, aged embassy compound that fails to meet security protocols, according to an internal investigation that raises new questions about the Obama administration's commitment to protecting Americans overseas in the aftermath of the Benghazi tragedyIn fact, the department did not place Beirut on its latest list of high-threat diplomatic missions even though Lebanon is listed at the "critical" threat level for potential violence with its frequent rocket attacks, spillovers from the Syrian civil war and heavy presence of the terror group Hezbollah, the agency's inspector general said in a report reviewed by the Washington GuardianBeirut was also the site of one of America's deadliest terror attacks, the 1983 bombing of a Marine barracks that killed more than 240 servicemembers...

Diplomats face serious threats while working at the 18-acre “cramped, aged and difficult to maintain office" located on a "steep and hilly compound” located 20 minutes from downtown Beirut, the report said. And their superiors back home in Washington seem unaware of the threat level, failing to harden weak physical security or provide needed counterterrorism training, the inspector general observed. The risks remain high as the civil war in Syria continues to threaten the stability of Lebanon due to the influx of more than 325,000 refugees, and tensions with Hezbollah remain high with frequent rocket attacks and other skirmishes.

Advertisement

The State Department hasn't seen fit to classify its top diplomatic outpost in a Middle Eastern nation in the thrall of Hezbollah, with a brutal civil war raging next door, as "high risk."   Worse, our embassy compound there failed to meet basic security protocols.  Sound familiar?  Sec. Kerry has been on the job for four months and may have been blindsided by this IG report.  What is Sec. Clinton's excuse?  This assessment would be damning under any circumstances, but it's completely intolerable in the shadow of September's terrorist attacks that killed the US ambassador to Libya and three other Americans.  In their efforts to fend off questions and probes into the massive failures that occurred on September 11, 2012, the Obama administration has taken umbrage at any accusation of wrongdoing or negligence.  They routinely retreat to warmed-over bromides about "taking the steps necessary to ensure that something like this never happens again."  That's the only lesson they want anyone to derive from the Benghazi massacre -- yet they themselves evidently have not internalized it.  In the days following the lethal raid, the president told a Univision audience that his "number one priority is to keep our diplomats safe."  Number one, he said.  Just words.  Obama's most notable tangible action in response to Benghazi is to promote some of the central figures of the administration's cover-up.  Susan Rice
Advertisement
ascended to the perch of National Security Adviser this week, and Victoria Nuland will reportedly be nominated as an Assistant Secretary of State.  GOP Senators vow to use her confirmation hearings as a leverage point to extract more information from this secretive administration.  Democrats are pre-emptively denouncing Republicans' truth-seeking efforts, complaining that their opponents "are wrong to keep the Benghazi scandal alive."  Sen. Diane Feinstein said it's time to put the issue "to bed."  The American people disagree, according to a NYT/CBS poll released this week:


Amid investigations into the terrorist attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, a majority of Americans - including more than three in four Republicans (77 percent) and six in 10 independents (59 percent) - think the Obama administration is mostly hiding something on the issue of Benghazi. A majority of Democrats (59 percent) think the Obama administration is mostly telling the truth.

Overall, 53 percent of Americans believe the Obama administration is "mostly" covering up the real story on Benghazi, while 34 percent say they're mostly telling the truth.  What's plain as day is that the Left desperately wants to shut down debate on this issue.  Witness MSNBC primetime anchor Lawrence O'Donnell's
Advertisement
repulsive tweet:


So eager was O'Donnell to punish unwelcome commentary on Benghazi that he defiled the sacrifice of New York's bravest in order to level the cheapest of nonsensical shots.  Sick.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement