An Iranian Political Prisoner Said This About Obama and October 7...and CNN Panicked
What Is Trump's 'Shield of the America's' Initiative?
Surprise: Democrats Aren't Happy With Kristi Noem's Firing
Markwayne Mullin Doesn't Have a Bachelor's Degree. So What?
Not Even the Democratic Mayor's Staff Is Safe in Crime-Ridden San Francisco
A New Jersey Girl Scout Troop Is Catching Heat for Where It Chose...
Are California Voters About to Require Voter ID in State Elections?
The Democrats Laughed at Space Force. They're Not Laughing Anymore
An Old Clip of Marco Rubio Warning About Obama’s Iran Deal Is Going...
Did You See Gavin Newsom's Embarrassing Interview With Katie Couric
Bill O'Reilly: The Mainstream Media Wants America to Lose in Iran
Pray for Peace in the Middle East
Russian National Charged in $1.2M Medicare Fraud Scheme
New Jersey Man Admits Bringing 100 Explosive Devices to D.C. Cathedral
D.C. Dentist, Hygienist Convicted in $4M Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Judge Strikes Down Collective Bargaining Law

Wisconsin Judge Strikes Down Collective Bargaining Law

No need to panic, folks; the ruling is based solely on a technicality and doesn't erode the substance of the law itself:
 

In a 33-page decision issued Thursday, Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi said she would freeze the legislation because GOP lawmakers on a committee broke the state's open meetings law in passing it March 9. The legislation limits collective bargaining to wages for all public employees in Wisconsin except for police and firefighters.

"It's what we were looking for," said Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, a Democrat.

Ozanne sued to block the law after Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) filed a complaint saying that GOP legislative leaders had not given proper notice to the public in convening a conference committee of lawmakers from both houses to approve Walker's budget-repair bill.

Advertisement


There are two possible remedies for this injunction.  First, Republicans could appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court, which -- as we are gloriously aware -- remains in conservative hands.  The Wisconsin legislature sets its own rules, and Republicans' actions in March were deemed to be compliant with those rules at the time by non-partisan legislative officers.  Republicans view this decision as a judicial intrusion onto the legislative branch's turf, and are therefore objecting to it based on separation-of-powers arguments:
 

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) responded in a statement. "There's still a much larger separation-of-powers issue: whether one Madison judge can stand in the way of the other two democratically elected branches of government. The Supreme Court is going to have the ultimate ruling, and they're still scheduled to hear the issue on June 6. This overdue reform is still a critical part of balancing Wisconsin's budget."


Second, the state Senate could simply re-pass the bill, which would nullify the basis for this ruling.  The GOP is reportedly considering doing exactly that -- and Democrats seemed resigned to let that happen (ie, they won't flee the state again):
 

Democrats widely expect Republicans in the state legislature to simply attempt to re-pass the measure as law, and this time, the Democratic state senators won't be leaving the state to slow down the process.

"There's nothing that we can do," said state Sen. Jim Holperin (D-Conover). "Republicans have the votes to do this, and if they choose to do it, they can and they will."

Advertisement

Related:

WISCONSIN


In other words, this judge's decision is a small blip on the radar screen.  Governor Walker's law -- which reduces state spending and debt, saves middle class jobs, and avoids adding to Wisconsinites' tax burden, all while mantaining more generous collective bargaining privileges for government workers than federal employees enjoy -- will remain in effect.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos