Kash Patel Becomes the Focus of Media Analysis They Consistently Get Wrong
How America Has Destroyed Its Democracy, Part Two: The Aristocracy of Merit
Three Congressional Missteps on Healthcare
Today’s Qualifications to Be President of the U.S.
Climate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
Ukraine's Bureaucrats Are Finishing What China Started
Rising Federal Debt: Why Strategic Planning Matters More Than Ever for High-Net-Worth Fami...
Classroom Political Activism Shifts a Teacher’s Role from Educator to Indoctrinator
As America Celebrates 250, We Must Help Iran Celebrate Another 2,500
Guatemalan Citizen Admits Using Stolen Identity to Obtain Custody of Teen Migrant
Oregon-Based Utility PacifiCorp Settles for $575M Over Six Devastating Wildfires
Armed Man Rammed Substation Near Las Vegas in Apparent Terror Plot Before Committing...
DOJ Moves to Strip U.S. Citizenship From Former North Miami Mayor Over Immigration...
DOJ Probes Three Michigan School Districts That Allegedly Teach Gender Ideology
5th Circuit Vacates Ruling That Blocked Louisiana's Mandate to Display 10 Commandments in...
Tipsheet

Transparency: Obama WH Employs Political Vetting Process for FOIA Requests

Transparency: Obama WH Employs Political Vetting Process for FOIA Requests
Nope, I'm not referring this story (Headline: "Obama Gets Openness Award In Private").  I'm referring to this one, which details the administration's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) political review process:
Advertisement


Under grilling by top GOP oversight official Rep. Darrell Issa at a hearing Thursday on special political reviews of document requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) submitted by journalists, watchdog groups and lawmakers, Obama administration officials defended the process saying, in the words of a top lawyer, the practice was “sound managerial practice.”

But even while defending the special reviews by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s top political lieutenants, the agency’s top FOIA official admitted the serious delays caused by the process were “not up to my standards” and pointed to changes made after the Associated Press requested reams of documents about how it worked in the summer of 2010.


The hearings disclosed that two specific types of FOIA requests triggered special high-level political reviews:

The hearing highlighted that two categories of document requests went straight to the Obama White House for an even more stringent review.

Requests regarding the calendar for cabinet officials and any document requests related to Obama’s massive economic stimulus were subject to those reviews.


I understand that the former information may be sensitive for security reasons, but as for the latter issue, I share Rep. Jason. Chafetz's curiosity:

Why? Why does that require special White House review,” asked Rep. Jason Chafetz about the White House review of requests related to the stimulus.

“Sir, I’m the chief FOIA officer I’m not a policy person in this area,” Callahan said, “I believe I was instructed by the Office of the Secretary to do that and we processed it accordingly.”

Advertisement
 
From the White House website:

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government.  We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

Do as I say, etc...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos