About That 'Racist' Video the Trump Team Posted Featuring the Obamas...It's a Fake...
Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

New HHS "Cost-Reducing" Regulations Could Actually Hike Premiums

On Monday, we told you about Kathleen Sebelius' new HHS regulation, which instructs private health insurers how they must spend their money and render their services.  I warned about the negative Massachusetts precedent, which has already demonstrated how tight government control leads to bruising legal battles and an ever more intrusive State.  The endgame, I suspect, is putting the entire private industry out of business, which has long been a fantasy of the Left.
Advertisement


As a more immediate concern, Reason's Peter Suderman raises another objection to HHS' edict: While purporting to reduce healthcare costs, it could very well end up increasing them:

If anything, mandatory MLRs encourage health insurers to drive overall spending upwards: Because profits and administrative costs will be limited to a small portion of each premium dollar, they end up tied to spending on medical services. So if an insurance company wants to expand the pool of potential profit dollars, one easy way to do that is by increasing spending on medical services and thus increasing premiums. And with some administrative cost-saving activities limited as well, that will be even easier.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says the rules "guarantee that consumers get the most out of their premium dollars." I’m not sure they guarantee much of anything, but a better bet is that they’ll result in insurers getting more premium dollars out of consumers.

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE

 
Depending on how you view this entire process, this is either a nasty unintended consequence of Obamacare, or a nasty, entirely intended consequence of the law.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos