What the Hell Happened to This Show?
Jimmy Kimmel: Fake Progressive Hero Of The Year
Some of Us May Die, But It's a Sacrifice Democrats Are Willing to...
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 300: Praise God for 300! It Began Because...
Minnesota: Exporting Wealth, Importing Pirates
Lebanon at a Crossroads: Time to Cut the Iranian Cord
How Do We Know When We’re Winning? Just Read the New York Times
We Need to Be Reminded Once Again that Jesus Was Not a Palestinian
'Mental Health' or 'Evil': It Can’t be Both
Hamas Operatives Funneled Over $8 Million to Military Wing in Italian Fundraising Scheme
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Is Pregnant
Louisiana Conspiracy Used Chop Shop and Fake Company to Sell Stolen Tractors, Excavators,...
Over $200,000 in Cryptocurrency Forfeited in Multi-State Elder Fraud Case
Cops Seize 55 Pounds of Drugs Disguised as Christmas Presents
Jamaican National Sentenced to More Than 24 Years in Federal Meth Trafficking Case
Tipsheet

Finally: McMahon Ties Blumenthal to Chris Dodd in Connecticut

In an 11th hour revelation, Linda McMahon's Senate campaign has at last* remembered there's a reason why she's running against Dick Blumenthal instead of the incumbent, Chris Dodd:
Advertisement


(Feb 2009) The Quinnipiac University poll puts Dodd's approval rating at 41 percent with a 48 percent disapproval rating marking his worst approval rating in the history of the Quinnipiac poll.   By a 54-24 margin, voters surveyed say they aren't satisfied with Dodd's explanation of the loans and 51 percent of say they "probably won't" or "definitely won't" vote for him.  These terrible numbers come after a steady drumbeat of critical editorials in Connecticut newspapers.

McMahon has launched a new ad reminding voters of exactly why they were prepared to toss Dodd out of the Senate before he beat them to the punch with a surprise retirement announcement.  By raising the specter of the Countrywide mortgage scandal, McMahon's campaign is tying her current opponent to his corrupt ally and predecessor and implicitly making the case for a clean break:



Hmmm.  Saddling a political opponent with the humiliating record of his discredited, corrupt Democratic predecessor?  I'm no expert, but perhaps another Republican might want to give that a shot.

*In fairness to McMahon, when it comes to criticizing Blumenthal, there's no shortage of fodder.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement