Biden Censorship Official Can't Answer Basic Questions About the First Amendment
KJP Cornered on Biden’s Terrorism Appeasement Narrative
The Perfect Symbol to Describe the Pro-Hamas Crowd Was Discovered at USC
One Moment Amid Campus Chaos at UNC Chapel Hill Will Give You Hope...
Another Red State Takes Illegal Immigration Into Its Own Hands
The List of 'Needs' that Entitled Pro-Hamas Students Are Demanding Include 'Vegan Food,...
Florida's Six-Week Abortion Ban Takes Effect
Vulnerable Dem Incumbent Sherrod Brown Flip-Flops on Pro-Hamas Protests
Here's How Trump Is Performing in These Battleground States
Video Shows Moment ‘Trans’ Sex Offender Tries to Snatch Child From School Grounds
Trump Campaign Wanted Earlier Debates, but Commission Is Sticking to Original Schedule
One State Will Require Students to Watch Pro-Life Prenatal Development Videos in Schools
Fani Willis Challenger Debates Empty Podium After DA Skips Face-Off
Washington’s Troops, Today’s Protesters
NY Squad Members Hardest Hit by NYPD's Involvement in Quelling Columbia's Pro-Hamas Protes...
Tipsheet

CNN/Time's New Outlier Polls

A new batch of state polls from CNN and Time smell pretty ripe to me for a few reasons.

(1) Time's write-up of the polls doesn't even accurately reflect the actual results
Advertisement
, and greatly exaggerates Democratic advantages in a number of cases.  For example, Reporter Jay Newton-Small informs readers that Barbara Boxer leads Carly Fiorina among likely voters by a 56/37 margin.  In reality, the poll shows Boxer's lead at 52/43.  Newton-Small makes the same mistake on several other occasions, including when he incorrectly reports the Illinois Senate and Governor numbers.  (Upon further review, it looks as though Newton-Small sloppily conflated the polls' "registered voters" and "likely voters" results).

(2) As far as I could see, neither news outlet provides the poll's sample breakdown.  If its D/R/I splits are reasonable and generally reflect the current political climate (ie, reflect lower Democratic turnout and enthusiasm than 2008), then Republicans on the short end of these surveys may have cause for concern.  If, as we saw with the recent bogus California and Kentucky polls, the samples are unrealistically skewed toward Democrats, these results would be rendered meaningless.  The fact is, we just can't reach either conclusion without a good look at the missing sample data.

(3) Other polls tell radically different stories.  Various polling firms have polled all of these races within the last week or so, and CNN/Time's results stick out like a sore thumb.  Rasmussen, for example, shows
Advertisement
Joe Miller leading big over both Lisa Murkowski and Scott McAdams.  Almost every single poll I've seen out of the Illinois Governor race shows Republican Bill Brady ahead by at least 5-8 points not neck-and-neck.  In Florida, Democrat Alex Sink has built a small but stable lead over Rick Scott in most surveys, yet this new poll shows Scott seizing the lead (although, in fairness, the latest Rasmussen also has Scott ahead).  Frankly, I don't have faith in any of the three results I just ran down.  I don't believe that Lisa Murkowski's write-in effort has catapulted her into a tie.  I'm deeply skeptical that Pat Quinn has somehow stormed back to tie Brady in Illinois.  And even though I'm pulling for them, I'm a little dubious of news that the Republican ticket has made an inexplicable comeback in the Florida Governor's race.

The ultimate poll doesn't happen until November 2nd, but in the meantime, we'll stay on the lookout for polls of all stripes.  If they smell a little fishy to us, we'll tell you why.  In this case, the CNN/Time polls reek. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement