Here's the Line From Javier Milei's Address to Argentina's Congress That Brought Down...
Marco Rubio Got Very Sassy With the Fake News Media Regarding the Iran...
Trump's Top Middle East Negotiator Dropped a Bombshell About Iran and Its Nuke...
Zohran Mamdani Has Already Broken His Promise to Be Transparent
Iranian Missile Attack Leaves Seven Israelis Wounded
NATO's Secretary General Confirms Iran Was on Its Way to Getting Nuclear Weapons
Here's More on the Israeli Strikes on the Meeting of the Iranian Supreme...
War! What Is It Good For? Liberating Women.
Report: Israeli Strike Just Hit Another Meeting of the Iranian Supreme Council
DHS Slams Governor Spanberger for Protecting a Murderer Over Virginians
Virginia Circuit Court: Yeah, the Dem Redistricting Scheme Is Illegal, but We'll Allow...
This MN Rep Wants to Unmask ICE So Leftists Can Terrorize Them
Abigail Spanberger Is Protecting the Criminal Illegal Who Murdered a Virginia Woman
Canada's MAiD Program Crossed a Grim Threshold
JD Vance Explains Why Operation Epic Fury Isn't Another Forever War
Tipsheet

Is Twitter Willing to Ban President-Elect Trump?

Is Twitter Willing to Ban President-Elect Trump?

In 2012, the general manager of Twitter in the UK spoke at the Guardian Changing Media Summit: “Generally, we remain neutral as to the content because our general council and CEO like to say that we are the free speech wing of the free speech party.”

Advertisement

Boy, have things changed since then. 

Earlier this month, Twitter suspended a number of accounts associated with the alt-right movement. Among those suspended was Richard Spencer, the National Policy Institute, Radix Journal, Paul Town, Pax Dickinson, Ricky Vaughn and John Rivers. Some might argue that Twitter’s suspension of these accounts is content discrimination. In other words, Twitter is censoring users simply because of their views. That doesn't sound like “remaining neutral” or promoting free speech.

Unfortunately, censorship seems to be Twitter’s new favorite weapon - and it’s not afraid to take aim at Trump. 

Slate recently asked Twitter whether it would consider banning key government officials or even the president. A company spokesperson responded via email: “The Twitter Rules prohibit violent threats, harassment, hateful conduct, and multiple account abuse, and we will take action on accounts violating those policies.” 

Slate pushed a bit more, asking if Trump could be suspended if he violated these policies, hypothetically speaking. 

“The Twitter Rules apply to all accounts, including verified accounts,” the spokesperson responded.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos