No, This Is Not the End of Tariffs
The US Men's Hockey Team Got a Call After Beating Canada Yesterday. You...
The Reactions to Team USA's Win Over Canada Were Amazing, But This One...
This Tweet From Kyle Rittenhouse About Trans Folk and ICE Will Surely Trigger...
JPMorgan Finally Admitted What It Did to Trump After 2020 Election
You'll Own Nothing: Latest Scottish Wealth Tax Plan Targets Property, Pensions and Jewelry
Check Out This Daily Mail Headline About Mexican Tourists Who Are Terrified of...
These Previous Remarks by Mexican President Sheinbaum Explain Why the Cartel Caused Chaos...
Your Kid Doesn’t Need Sushi. He Needs to Hear the Word ‘No.’
Leaked DNC Autopsy of 2024 Election Blames This for Kamala's Loss to President...
Tony Evers Just Guaranteed Wisconsin Energy Bills Will Skyrocket for the Next 20...
Mamdani Defends Shoveling ID Requirements As Few New Yorkers Sign Up to Dig...
Gavin Newsom Just Had a Joe Biden Moment
They Mean Retribution
Tipsheet

Bessent Details Plan to Restore Tariffs While Clashing With CNN's Dana Bash Over Potential Tariff Refunds

Bessent Details Plan to Restore Tariffs While Clashing With CNN's Dana Bash Over Potential Tariff Refunds
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

Scott Bessent explained to CNN’s Dana Bash how the Trump administration plans to restore its previous tariff levels after the Supreme Court struck down its authority to impose sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 

Advertisement

In response to the ruling, President Trump outlined new tariffs he intends to implement under alternative statutory authorities. Bessent detailed how those statutes could be used to reach prior tariff rates and described the process the administration would follow.

"This 122 authority is good for 150 days," Bessent said. "During that time, we will do study on Section 232, which will be done by the Commerce Department, Section 301, which will be done by USTR. Those tariffs remain in effect and have withstood more than 4,000 challenges since the President's first term."

The statutes Bessent referenced include Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to impose an across-the-board tariff of up to 15 percent for a limited period of up to 150 days, to address balance-of-payments concerns. He also pointed to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which authorizes tariffs after an investigation by the Commerce Department has found that certain imports threaten U.S. national security. In addition, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 permits the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to impose tariffs or take other measures in response to unfair trade practices, including forced technology transfer or discriminatory policies.

"So during that time, it is very likely that those studies will result in higher 232s, higher 301s, and it will get us back to the same tariff level," Bessent added. "We've been in touch with our foreign trading partners, and all of them want to keep the trade deals that have been set. You know, Dana, we've had great economic results over the past year, 4.1 percent, second quarter GDP, 4.3, 4.4, and the third quarter, and it would have been a very strong fourth quarter if the Democrats hadn't shut down the government to hurt the American people."

Advertisement

Bash then asked whether the Trump administration would refund the roughly $134 billion it had collected in tariff revenue. The Treasury secretary acknowledged that the Supreme Court had not addressed whether IEEPA tariff revenue must be returned, and had pushed it back to lower courts. He added that the administration would not get ahead of the courts.

"Well, Dana, that's not the big question. Let's just level set here," Bessent said. "What the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the President's authority under the IEEPA tariffs. We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning, Section 232 tariffs, Section 301 tariffs. And, Dana, when you say it's a big question, that's bad framing because the Supreme Court didn't even address that."

"The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court. And, you know, we will follow what they say, but that could be weeks or months when we hear them," Bessent added. "So the Supreme Court did not address refunds."

Bash continued to press Bessent on the prospect of refunds, but he maintained that he would not get ahead of the courts.

"Well, the Justice Department told a federal appeals court in this very case last year if tariffs imposed on plaintiffs during these appeals are ultimately held unlawful, then the government will issue refunds to plaintiffs," Bash said.

Advertisement

"Again, I'm not going to get out ahead of the court," Bessent replied. "We will follow the court's direction. But, as I said, that could be weeks or months away. That decision was not rendered on Friday."

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump’s leadership and bold policies, America’s economy is back on track.

Help us continue to report on the president’s economic successes and combat the lies of the Democrats. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement