Bill Maher Made Adam Schiff and Don Lemon Look Like Morons Last Night
The Nine Lives of Kristi Noem...and She Used Them All Very Quickly
A Colorado Dem Just Got Busted for Peddling a Massive Campaign Lie
Report: Russia Is Helping Iran Target US Forces
It Must Be Nice Being Married to a Democrat
MS NOW Has Iranian Official Proving the White House Correct; CNN Panel Shouts...
Illegal Immigrant Arrested for Allegedly Voting in 2024 Pennsylvania Federal Election
Key Iranian Oil Infrastructure Targeted in Latest Operation Epic Fury Strikes
Six U.S. Soldiers Killed in Iran Strike Honored at Dover Air Force Base
FBI: Two Charged in Fraud Ring That Targeted Seniors Across Ohio, Michigan, and...
This New Report Destroys the Leftist Narrative on the Iranian Ship Sinking
Jury Convicts Two Women of Stalking ICE Officer After Livestreamed Pursuit
Southwest Flight Diverted Over Bomb Threat While Democrats Keep DHS Defunded
John Cornyn Announces Support for Ending Silent Filibuster to Pass SAVE America Act
Anti-Communist Protests Erupt in Havana As Trump Eyes Shake-Up in Cuban Leadership
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious Six' Controversy

Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious Six' Controversy
AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin

A federal judge ruled on Thursday that the Pentagon cannot cut Arizona Senator Mark Kelly's pay over the “Seditious Six” controversy, in which Kelly and five other Democratic colleagues urged National Guardsmen not to follow “illegal orders.” The video in question did not cite any specific illegal orders, but the Trump administration interpreted the remarks as an attempt by the Democrats to encourage disobedience among the National Guard, which had been deployed to several major U.S. cities to help curb rising crime rates.

Advertisement

Senior U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon, a George W. Bush appointee, ruled that the attempt to cut Sen. Kelly's pay was likely a violation of his First Amendment rights.

"Secretary Hegseth relies on the well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections given the fundamental obligation for obedience and discipline in the armed forces," Judge Leon wrote. "Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military. This Court will not be the first to do so!"

“This Court has all it needs to conclude that Defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly’s First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees. After all, as Bob Dylan famously said, ‘You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows,’” Leon continued. “To say the least, our retired veterans deserve more respect from their Government, and our Constitution demands they receive it!”

Advertisement

"Senator Kelly's First Amendment claim is not only justiciable; he is likely to succeed on the merits. He has also shown irreparable harm, and the balance of the equities falls decidedly in his favor," the judge added.

In early January, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth vowed to bring Sen. Kelly to justice, writing on X:

Six weeks ago, Senator Mark Kelly — and five other members of Congress — released a reckless and seditious video that was clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline. As a retired Navy Captain who is still receiving a military pension, Captain Kelly knows he is still accountable to military justice. And the Department of War — and the American people — expect justice.

Therefore, in response to Senator Mark Kelly’s seditious statements — and his pattern of reckless misconduct — the Department of War is taking administrative action against Captain Mark E. Kelly, USN (Ret). The department has initiated retirement grade determination proceedings under 10 U.S.C. § 1370(f), with reduction in his retired grade resulting in a corresponding reduction in retired pay.

Advertisement

Sen. Kelly blasted the move, claiming the lawsuit violated his rights as an American, and responded with a lawsuit of his own.

Pete Hegseth is coming after what I earned through my twenty-five years of military service, in violation of my rights as an American, as a retired veteran. His unconstitutional crusade against me sends a chilling message to every retired member of the military: if you speak out and say something that the President or Secretary of Defense doesn’t like, you will be censured, threatened with demotion, or even prosecuted.

It remains unclear whether the injunction will be appealed.

Editor's Note: Thanks to President Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth's leadership, the warrior ethos is coming back to America's military.

Help us report on Trump and Hegseth's successes as they make our military great again. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement