Wait, That's How Scott Pelley Reacted to His Firing From CBS News?
Iranian Dual Citizen Busted for Supplying Equipment to Tehran
The Scott Pelley Saga Is Over at CBS News, but Not the Melodramatics...
New 'American Options Doctrine' Would Transform US-Israel Relations
The Associated Press Is Married to Protecting Islam at Any Cost
Scott Pelley and Bari Weiss Respond to Pelley's Termination From CBS
California’s New Congressional Map May Have Just Backfired on Gavin Newsom
This Democrat Just Stormed Out of Marco Rubio's House Hearing
Katie Porter Falls Flat in California's Gubernatorial Race
Democrats' Maine Senate Gamble Raises Questions About Standards
'Reconciliation 3.0' Is Almost Here – And It Might Include the SAVE America Act
Four Republicans Join Democrats As U.S. House Passes Iran War Powers Resolution
Detransitioner Chloe Cole Testifies on Devastating Effects of Transition
Kansas Woman Sentenced for $450K Benefits Fraud Using Dead Relative’s Identity
Yes, People Still Voted for Eric Swalwell
Tipsheet

Cutting Red Tape: SCOTUS Narrows Environmental Regulation

Cutting Red Tape: SCOTUS Narrows Environmental Regulation
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The Supreme Court narrowed the scope of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), allowing American infrastructure projects to move forward without Federal Agencies having to consider broad and indirect environmental impacts. In other words, another bureaucratic hurdle was removed today. The ruling directly affects a project in Utah that planned an 88-mile railroad expansion to increase the transport of crude oil. It represents a major win for business and future infrastructure undertakings as the NEPA regulations can no longer require investigations into the environmental impacts upstream or downstream from the project itself.

Advertisement

The railroad expansion project in Utah would increase the amount of oil transported daily from around 80,000-85,000 barrels to between 225,000 to 350,000 barrels. The increase in oil transported would increase the domestic energy supply, energy security, and help contribute to growth in both the energy sector and the American economy. 

NEPA was signed into law in 1970, and "requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of their proposed actions prior to making decisions." As with all federal regulations, NEPA's powers have been broadly applied, often resulting in complications with American infrastructure projects. 

In the past, NEPA has been blamed for limiting American infrastructure projects in their development, according to the American Enterprise Institute. These projects generally take four-and-a-half years to be approved, and tend to come back in documents over 600 pages long. Furthermore, NEPA-related litigation is both costly and generally increases the timeframe and uncertainty in which the project should be completed. This disproportionately affects small contractors who often can't afford to be NEPA compliant and constantly lose out to large, more mainstream competitors. 

Advertisement

Opponents of the ruling claim that this will make way for increased damage to the environment.  However, by hamstringing infrastructure initiatives, which slow economic growth, we limit our ability to innovate on environmental solutions. A far more promising prospect.

The Supreme Court ruling stands as a win for American business, energy independence, and the American economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement