A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

Report: Letting Your Adult Children Live With You May Not Be Smart Financially

NBC News explains why:

Having your adult children living in your basement is worse than you think. Boomerang kids can actually hurt your chances of a sound retirement.

Those 65 years or older with financially independent children are more than twice as likely to be retired than people of the same age group who financially support their adult children, according to a new report that retirement market research firm Hearts & Wallets shared with CNBC.com.

That's because those who are still supporting their kids are often putting off retirement to do so, said Hearts & Wallets co-founder Chris Brown.

And it's a big group. The firm estimates that more than one-third of baby boomers are providing financial support to their children, family members or others. That's approximately 15.8 million boomer households, controlling nearly $8 trillion in investable assets.

Advertisement

That’s simply astounding. But what, exactly, constitutes “financial support”? Does this include Baby Boomers who are paying their kids’ bills -- or allowing them to live with them free of charge? Or both? Either way, I suppose the principle is the same: Baby Boomers are caring for their children financially in ways their parents never could have dreamed of.

Why? Perhaps one reason behind this phenomenon is the 2008 financial crisis. Unfortunately, I along with many of my fellow millennials finished up school at a time when the economy was unstable and jobs were scarce. A study last year reported by USA Today drives this point home: “One-quarter of millennials with a bachelor’s degree said they moved home at some point in their lives for financial reasons.” With no job prospects -- and little money -- what choice did they have?

The change also seems cultural in some ways. In the 1950s and 1960s, living with one’s parents after college was stigmatized, frowned upon, and atypical. Presumably this was motivation enough to leave the house. And yet individuals were also more inclined to get married younger. Hence they would not -- or perhaps could not -- live with their parents because they had a family of their own to take care of.

Advertisement

Related:

JOBS AND ECONOMY

But the good news is that the economy isn’t as bad as it was. There are jobs out there. So maybe Baby Boomers should take notice.

Otherwise, they may regret not showing their children the door when they should have.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement