Why Is the Acting Secret Service Director Heaping Praise on Mayorkas?
The Usual Suspects Are Very Mad Terrorists Are Dying
Why Was Iran's 'Diplomat' Carrying a Hezbollah Pager?
The New York Times Tried to Bait JD Vance, But He Was Ready...
The Teamsters Just Delivered a Body Blow to Kamala
Michigan Dem Has a Warning for Harris
Agent 00-Zero
Politico Points to 'Warning Signs' of Harris-Walz Campaign
This Blue State Just Made a Bombshell Admission Just Months Before the Election
Harris-Walz Want to Take Your Guns Away
A ‘Trans’ Actor Was Nominated for ‘Best Supporting Actress’
Kamala Harris Still Has the Worst Answers on What to Do About Grocery...
Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years
Poll Shows a Close Race in Wisconsin
Columnist Engages in Quite the Distraction on Tim Walz's Stolen Valor
Tipsheet

Fox News Crushes MSNBC in Ratings During Zimmerman Trial Verdict

When the George Zimmerman verdict was read Saturday evening and we learned that Zimmerman had been acquitted of second degree murder and was free to go, many Americans turned to cable news networks for breaking coverage. And unsurprisingly, most viewers did not turn to MSNBC:

Advertisement

MSNBC's ratings woes came into sharp relief on Monday with the release of the preliminary numbers for the Zimmerman verdict.

In the 10-11 p.m. hour on Saturday night, when the verdict in, Fox News had 3,682,000 total viewers; CNN had 3,407,000 total viewers and won the coveted demo with 1,716,000 viewers aged 25-to-54.

In the same hour, MSNBC had 1,298,000 total viewers -- about one-third of Fox's total -- and a mere 510,000 viewers in the demo. (These are preliminary numbers; finals are in tomorrow.)

Despite branding itself as "the place for politics," MSNBC went wall-to-wall on the Zimmerman trial after watching its ratings tank in recent months. It doesn't seemed to have helped.

These are only the preliminary numbers, of course, but I suspect MSNBC’s ratings deficits are far from over, and I have a few theories why.

Perhaps it’s because one of their paid contributors finds it completely acceptable to compare black conservative Supreme Court Justices to anti-Semitic Hitler fanatics (and get away with it, I might add). Or perhaps it’s because some anchors use wholly inappropriate and explicit language when describing House Republicans. (These are only two examples from the past month.) Remember, too, what Guy reminded us last year -- during the final week of the 2012 election, not one of the network’s stories about Mitt Romney was considered “positive” while at the same time not one of the stories about President Obama was considered “negative.” Their reputation for impartiality is really quite extraordinary.

Advertisement

In short, MSNBC's rank partisanship doesn’t even appear to be drawing viewers to their own network for a story they themselves pushed. Go figure.

H/T Politico

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement