So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
The Latest Trump Move Involving Minneapolis Is Going to Trigger a Lib Meltdown
Here’s Why That ICE Agent Involved in the Minneapolis Shooting Is in Hiding
Latest NYT Piece on Mamdani Shows How Being an American Liberal Is Just...
Why the Hell Should We Care If Democrats Don’t?
Israel Misunderstood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 303: The Best of St. Paul
Men Need to Work
Greenland and the Return of Great-Power Politics
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
Tipsheet
Premium

Constitution Expert Tells Us Why Gohmert's Lawsuit Against VP Pence Could Be a Game Changer

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

What's going to happen on January 6 when Congress meets to count states’ electoral votes? Rick Green, an attorney, constitutional expert, former Texas State Representative, and founder of leadership group Patriot Academy, gave us his best guess. In the latest turn of events in the dragged out 2020 presidential election, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) sued Vice President Mike Pence on Monday to try and give him the authority to choose the electors.

Quite a few people were confused by the move, but not Green. He says it's high time that we do something about the 1887 Electoral Count Act, which limits Pence's role in the vote count.

The New York Times argues, "The whole point of an election is to let the people decide who will rule them. If an incumbent could simply maneuver to keep himself in office — after all, a maneuver to protect Mr. Trump also protects Mr. Pence — the most foundational precept of our government would be gravely undermined."

But folks like Green want to see the Electoral Count Act overturned.

"Mostly because the federal statute is so completely confusing no one agrees on it," Green told Townhall on Tuesday. "It's just a complete mess." 

He cheered on Gohmert's "bold move." Gohmert, he explained, "knows the law" and "he understands the Constitution." 

"I'm thrilled he had the courage and foresight to do this," Green added. "We should be fighting for truth." 

"His point is that the Constitution does not give the power to the House and Senate," Green said of Gohmert. "He wants to get that question answered prior to January 6." 

Green, taking an original intent perspective, noted that the important historical fact is if the people of America did not want the vice president to have this power for the opening of the ballot count, "then the 12th Amendment would have addressed that." 

So, can President Trump still win re-election? Yes, Green said. But after a series of court losses he's lowered his expectations.

"If the rule of law is upheld, then absolutely he can still win," according to Green, who added the caveat that, "you have to have Republican leaders willing to fight for that." 

But so far, he noted, the Democrats "have fought much harder" than Republicans. 

"I've lowered my percentage to 10 percent," he told us. "This is no longer about Trump. It's very much about, 'does the law matter?'" 

Any senator that does not object to the results in Georgia, Wisconsin, and a handful of other key states, "is saying that they're OK with a governor or secretary of state changing the rules, making up law without the legislature involved." 

"It's a horrible precedent," he said. "It would mean we're no longer a republic."

With an eye on the future, Green said there should be "room for discussion for a constitutional amendment to tighten up counting of electoral votes."

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos