Here's Some Things to Know About Jack Smith Before His Testimony Today
Lefty Trump Supporter Wrecks the Political Class' Whining About Trump at Davos on...
New Hampshire Dem Senate Candidate Totally Melts Down Over This Question About ICE
This Exchange Between Old White Lib Women and a Black ICE Agent Was...
America's Murder Rate Plummeted In 2025 and No One Can Fully Explain It
Watch This Democrat Lawmaker Make a Fool of Himself Defending Jack Smith
This Primary Race Could Determine Who Dominates the Republican Party
Alleged Minneapolis Church Mob Ringleader Went on CNN Last Night. Here's What She...
AG Bondi Announces Arrests of Suspects Who Mobbed Minneapolis Church
Jason Crow: Democrats Plan to Impeach Trump If They Regain Power in November
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Just Insulted Justice Clarence Thomas
Here Are the Details of President Trump's Greenland Deal
President Trump Formally Charters the Board of Peace in Davos As His Gaza...
Gavin Newsom Poses With His Sugar Daddy Alex Soros
Chris Cuomo Goes on Unhinged Rant Against Scott Jennings for Using the Term...
Tipsheet

California Supreme Court Overturns Scott Peterson's Death Sentence

AP Photo/Justin Sullivan, Pool

The California Supreme Court has overturned the death sentence for Scott Peterson, who was accused of murdering his pregnant wife Laci in 2002. She was eight months pregnant with their unborn son, Conner, and found washed ashore on the San Francisco Bay months after the disappearance. The case captured the country's attention for months. And at the end of the trial, in November 2004, the jury found Peterson guilty of first-degree murder for killing Laci, and second-degree murder for killing Conner. He received the death penalty and has been waiting on death row at San Quentin State Prison ever since. Through it all, Peterson maintained his innocence.

Advertisement

Fifteen years later, Justice Leondra Kruger has reversed the ruling because, she argued, the trial judge at the time "made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection" that robbed Peterson of an impartial jury.

“Before the trial began, the trial court made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection that, under long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent, undermined Peterson’s right to an impartial jury at the penalty phase,” Kruger wrote.

“While a court may dismiss a prospective juror as unqualified to sit on a capital case if the juror’s views on capital punishment would substantially impair his or her ability to follow the law, a juror may not be dismissed merely because he or she has expressed opposition to the death penalty as a general matter."

The 47-year-old Peterson has also insisted that he received an unfair trial because of the massive amount of publicity the case received. He'll received a new trial, but only one that will take a look at his punishment.

The reactions to this surprising turn of events were mixed. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement