Naval Lawyer Delivers a Kill Shot to the Left's Uproar Over Trump's Airstrikes...
President Trump Is Right About Tim Walz
Jewish Parents Furious at School Over Muslim Club's Pro-Hamas Display
Trump Was Right to Slam the Brakes on Fuel-Efficiency Standards
Damning Watchdog Report Reveals 'Large-Scale Systemic Failures' Leading to Obamacare Subsi...
Occam's Bazooka
Tech Billionaire Drops $6.25 Billion Donation to Jump-Start Trump Accounts for 25 Million...
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD...
The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Illegal Alien, Son Arrested for Allegedly Trafficking 75 Firearms
Man Who Set Fire To Train With Victim Inside Face 40 Years in...
Former High-Level DEA Official Charged With Narcoterrorism in Alleged Plot to Aid CJNG...
Florida Man Convicted of Attempted Murder of Two Federal Officers in ATF Raid
DOJ Settlement Forces Constellation to Sell Six Power Plants in $26.6B Calpine Merger
Tipsheet

California Supreme Court Overturns Scott Peterson's Death Sentence

AP Photo/Justin Sullivan, Pool

The California Supreme Court has overturned the death sentence for Scott Peterson, who was accused of murdering his pregnant wife Laci in 2002. She was eight months pregnant with their unborn son, Conner, and found washed ashore on the San Francisco Bay months after the disappearance. The case captured the country's attention for months. And at the end of the trial, in November 2004, the jury found Peterson guilty of first-degree murder for killing Laci, and second-degree murder for killing Conner. He received the death penalty and has been waiting on death row at San Quentin State Prison ever since. Through it all, Peterson maintained his innocence.

Advertisement

Fifteen years later, Justice Leondra Kruger has reversed the ruling because, she argued, the trial judge at the time "made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection" that robbed Peterson of an impartial jury.

“Before the trial began, the trial court made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection that, under long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent, undermined Peterson’s right to an impartial jury at the penalty phase,” Kruger wrote.

“While a court may dismiss a prospective juror as unqualified to sit on a capital case if the juror’s views on capital punishment would substantially impair his or her ability to follow the law, a juror may not be dismissed merely because he or she has expressed opposition to the death penalty as a general matter."

The 47-year-old Peterson has also insisted that he received an unfair trial because of the massive amount of publicity the case received. He'll received a new trial, but only one that will take a look at his punishment.

The reactions to this surprising turn of events were mixed. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement