Pardon Every Single J6 Political Prisoner – Every Single One
Honestly, Who Cares If Michelle Obama Is at Trump’s Inauguration?
No One Should Be Fooled by Zuckerberg’s Supposed About-Face on Trump
Diversity Dysfunction: John Gentry Exposes The DEIA Foundations Of Government Weaponizatio...
Trump's Second Inaugural Address
A Breath of Fresh Air
These Crises Are the Direct Results of Democrat Policies
The Only Path Leading All the Way Out of Our Inflation Quagmire
America First Diplomacy Is Back With Marco Rubio
The Fight to Protect Life Is Far From Over
Accountability Still Matters
How to Win and Lose a War at the Same Time
Above Us Only Sky
The Fraudulent Populism of Our Leaders
Pete Hegseth Deserves Confirmation
Tipsheet

California Supreme Court Overturns Scott Peterson's Death Sentence

AP Photo/Justin Sullivan, Pool

The California Supreme Court has overturned the death sentence for Scott Peterson, who was accused of murdering his pregnant wife Laci in 2002. She was eight months pregnant with their unborn son, Conner, and found washed ashore on the San Francisco Bay months after the disappearance. The case captured the country's attention for months. And at the end of the trial, in November 2004, the jury found Peterson guilty of first-degree murder for killing Laci, and second-degree murder for killing Conner. He received the death penalty and has been waiting on death row at San Quentin State Prison ever since. Through it all, Peterson maintained his innocence.

Advertisement

Fifteen years later, Justice Leondra Kruger has reversed the ruling because, she argued, the trial judge at the time "made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection" that robbed Peterson of an impartial jury.

“Before the trial began, the trial court made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection that, under long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent, undermined Peterson’s right to an impartial jury at the penalty phase,” Kruger wrote.

“While a court may dismiss a prospective juror as unqualified to sit on a capital case if the juror’s views on capital punishment would substantially impair his or her ability to follow the law, a juror may not be dismissed merely because he or she has expressed opposition to the death penalty as a general matter."

The 47-year-old Peterson has also insisted that he received an unfair trial because of the massive amount of publicity the case received. He'll received a new trial, but only one that will take a look at his punishment.

The reactions to this surprising turn of events were mixed. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement