Immigration Agents Launched an Easter Offensive and Picked Up Some Really Bad Hombres
Some Said Israeli Special Forces Assisted in Rescuing the Second F-15 Crew Member....
Trump Revealed Why He Dropped an F-Bomb in His Easter Post. It's Pretty...
This Is What Markwayne Mullin Has Been Up to Since Taking Over DHS
How Iran's Military Responded to Trump's Threat
The NY Times Delivers a Fiasco of a Headline; the Press Continues to...
No, Tony Evers, We Will Not 'Deal With It'
Appeals Court Rules Maine's 72-Hour Waiting Period for Gun Sales Likely Constitutional
Iran's Greatest Ally Is the Left
Do We Need A 28th Amendment To Fix Birthright Citizenship
Focusing on Fraud May Be How the GOP Wins the Midterms
Here's How President Trump Would Prefer to Proceed in Iran
Here Is What Iran Was Able to Salvage From US Equipment Left Behind...
The Tony Gonzales Situation Just Got Even Worse
It Turns Out That Democrats Support Requiring ID...But Only For Free Admission Into...
Tipsheet

Dershowitz Reacts to Criticism of His Latest Defense Presentation

Dershowitz Reacts to Criticism of His Latest Defense Presentation
AP Photo/Richard Drew

Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz argued in his presentation in the Senate on Wednesday that if a president believed his re-election was in the "public interest," then whatever quid pro quo he might be accused of is moot. Democrats and the media mocked the Harvard law professor and tried to discredit him. According to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), he and his colleagues couldn't roll their eyes hard enough while Dershowitz was speaking.

Advertisement

The lawyer and Trump defense team member responded on Twitter with a few clarifications about the motives that may drive a president to act the way he or she does.

For his third point - that helping own's re-election effort is not necessarily akin to corruption - Dershowitz used the policies of the 16th president of the United States as precedent.

Dershowitz shared a few more excerpts from his argument. For example, he asked the jurors to consider a what if scenario. What if President Obama decided to break his promise to bomb Syria for their chemical weapons attack because it would have cost him Democratic votes?

Advertisement

Related:

IMPEACHMENT

The lawyer used these hypotheticals to conclude that the Framers "did not intend impeachment for mixed motive decisions that contain an element of personal partisan benefit."

"Critics have an obligation to respond to what I said, not to create straw men to attack," Dershowitz tweets in closing.

Some Republican senators like Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) defended the lawyer to explain that "he was talking about rooting out corruption." And that, she said, is in the public interest.

Democrats have been hammering for more witnesses, but that effort appears to have been effectively stopped. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell appears to have the votes needed to block that effort, end the trial, and acquit the president.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement