Pentagon Does 'Not Believe' Aid to Temporary Pier Is Reaching Residents of Gaza
Just Wait Until You Hear Kirby's Reasoning for Why the WH Is Offering...
Biden and Democrats Put Political Agenda Ahead of Workers Amid FDIC Scandal
White House Issues Nine Corrections to Biden’s NAACP Speech
‘Biden Ain’t Black!’ Why Minorities Are Dumping Democrats and Embracing Trump
Major Shakeup at the World Economic Forum: 'Global Elitism Is on Notice'
Here's What's 'Especially Remarkable' About Trump's April Fundraising Numbers
Here's How Unused COVID-19 Funds Will Be Spent Under New Senate Bill
'Never Seen Such a Spectacle': Alan Dershowitz Was 'Shocked' by What He Saw...
Supreme Court Will Not Hear Parents’ Challenge to a Woke School District’s Transgender...
McConnell: Unlike Certain Others, I Will Offer Zero Condolences for the 'Butcher of...
A Swim Club Allowed a ‘Transgender’ to Use the Women’s Facilities. Here’s How...
Fossil Fuels Are the Answer to Asia’s Hot Summers
One Country Just Voted to Decriminalize the Possession of Child Pornography
'Like a Bomb:' CNN Analyst Again Shocked by Michael Cohen's Latest Courtroom Meltdown
Tipsheet
Premium

Tim Scott Believes He's Figured Out Chuck Schumer's Impeachment Motives

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The impeachment process is a "win-win" for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Republicans have begun to observe. In the Democrats' best case scenario, the Senate may remove President Trump from office. If that doesn't pan out, they will, at the very least, have forced vulnerable Republican senators to take a difficult vote.

"What I do realize is that the whole conversation about witnesses have nothing to do with impeaching the president," Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) shared on Sunday. "It has everything to do with removing at least four senators from office who are Republicans. The entire process of calling witnesses that were not heard in the House is about getting Cory Gardner to take tough votes. It’s about having Susan Collins take tough votes. It’s about having Thom Tillis in North Carolina take tough votes. It’s about Martha McSally taking tough votes. The subplot to having witnesses before the Senate has nothing to do with illuminating the case or bringing more information to the surface. It has everything to do with putting those pivotal senators between a rock and a hard place."

A few of Scott's Republican colleagues heartily agreed with his assessment.

"Yeah, he’s exactly right about what the Democrats want to do here," Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said Tuesday morning in a radio interview with Hugh Hewitt. "Chuck Schumer has even said last week that he views impeachment as a win-win. Either they remove Donald Trump from office, or they force senators in tough races to take tough votes."

Sen. David Perdue (R-GA), who also joined Hewitt's radio program on Tuesday, said Sen. Scott is "100 percent" right. 

"We see it on the floor every day," Perdue said. "This has nothing to do with the truth. They’re not trying to protect the republic. This is all about undoing the 2016 election, affecting the 2020 presidential election, and gaining the majority of the Senate."

Other Democrats have set their sights on moderate Republican senators like Mitt Romney (UT) and Susan Collins (ME), who they believe they can convince to vote in favor of allowing additional witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial.

Democratic leaders have reportedly tried to stifle vulnerable Republicans' policy agendas too. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) mused earlier this year that the reason her friend Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) suddenly bowed out of their bipartisan effort to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act is because Schumer pressured her to.

"Anybody that's up in 2020, Schumer doesn't want to move on legislation sponsored by them," Ernst said she heard from friends in the Senate. "Because it would be a win for me, and we can't have that."

The Democrats' impeachment trial against President Trump officially began Tuesday afternoon.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement