Supreme Court Just Delivered Devastating News for Dems in Their Redistricting Fight
Texas Supreme Court Ends Abbott's Push to Expel Lawmakers Who Fled the State...
Texas to House the Nation's First Detransitioner Clinic
The AP Wants to Ban Guns Not Being Used; NBC News Frets a...
In the UK, Offensive Words Are Now an Offense Punishable by Death
Wait Until California Taxpayers Hear About yet Another Newsom Spending Debacle
Senator Bernie Moreno Sounds the Alarm on Chinese Vehicles Entering the US
Venezuela Opposition Leader Refuses to Take the Bait As CNN Presses Her on...
The UAE Has a Plan to Circumvent Iran and the Strait of Hormuz...
Abortion by Mail Must Stop
Iraqi Terror Commander Arrested for Plotting Nearly 20 Attacks in U.S. and Europe
Lottery Scammer Pushed 73-Year-Old to Sell Her Home for a Prize That Never...
Virginia's New Gun Ban Faces Immediate Legal Challenge From Second Amendment Groups
Former Labor Dept. Employee Pleads Guilty to Stealing $46K in Pandemic Unemployment Funds
Michigan Nurse Convicted in $1.6M Medicare Fraud Scheme Using Stolen Patient Records
Tipsheet

Judge Orders Jussie Smollett Case Files Be Released

Judge Orders Jussie Smollett Case Files Be Released
Photo by Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP

An Illinois judge has ordered that the documents in Jussie Smollett's controversial case in Chicago can be released. Initially, his lawyers had argued that the documents be sealed to protect the "Empire" actor's privacy. Yet, it seems Smollett derailed his own case because he spoke so openly about the verdict.

Advertisement

"I have been truthful and consistent on every single level from day one," he said defiantly in a press conference following his court appearance.

According to Cook County Judge G. Watkins, there's no longer any "conceivable" reason why the documents should be kept secret.

"To be sure, it is easily conceivable that a defendant whose case was dismissed would wish to maintain his sense of privacy, even if, perhaps especially if, the media covered the case," Judge Steven G. Watkins wrote in the decision. "However, that isn't that case."

"While the court appreciates that the defendant was in the public eye before the events that precipitated this case, it was not necessary for him to address this so publicly and to such an extent. By doing so, the court cannot credit his privacy interest as good cause to keep the case records sealed," the decision said. (NBC News)

Advertisement

In January, Smollett reported being attacked by two homophobic male President Trump supporters in Chicago in the middle of the night. The two suspects, brothers from Nigeria, eventually confessed to police that it was all a hoax and that Smollett had paid them to attack him. Prosecutors dropped all charges against the actor in March.

The same month, Trump tweeted that the DOJ and the FBI will be investigating the case.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement