'Thank You Darling, Have a Good Time': Trump Storms Out of Interview With...
John Fetterman Says He'll Wear a Suit If Graham Platner Releases Inappropriate Texts...
Remaining '60 Minutes' Crew Remains, Upsetting the Press; the 'Cajun Raisin' Carville Prov...
The Left Sacrifices Our Girls on the Altar of Trump Derangement Syndrome
Are You Now or Have You Ever
The Republicans Are Saps and Saps Deserve to Lose
Illegal Immigrant Who Ran Cocaine Ring From His Bedroom Gets 12 Months in...
Scott Pelley's Post-Firing Pity Tour Is Everything Wrong With Legacy Media
Trump Tells Iran After Missile Barrage on Israel: 'That's Enough — Get Back...
Iran Fires Ballistic Missiles at Israel; IDF Intercepts
12 Shot, 2 Critically Wounded at Toledo’s Old West End Festival
James Talarico Goes On Damage Control For Prior Vegan Campaign
Spencer Pratt Might Get Shut Out of the LA Mayoral Race
America’s $521 Billion Fraud Problem Is Finally Meeting Its Match
Support for Ukraine Growing Among US Christian Leaders
Tipsheet

Judge Orders Jussie Smollett Case Files Be Released

Judge Orders Jussie Smollett Case Files Be Released
Photo by Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP

An Illinois judge has ordered that the documents in Jussie Smollett's controversial case in Chicago can be released. Initially, his lawyers had argued that the documents be sealed to protect the "Empire" actor's privacy. Yet, it seems Smollett derailed his own case because he spoke so openly about the verdict.

Advertisement

"I have been truthful and consistent on every single level from day one," he said defiantly in a press conference following his court appearance.

According to Cook County Judge G. Watkins, there's no longer any "conceivable" reason why the documents should be kept secret.

"To be sure, it is easily conceivable that a defendant whose case was dismissed would wish to maintain his sense of privacy, even if, perhaps especially if, the media covered the case," Judge Steven G. Watkins wrote in the decision. "However, that isn't that case."

"While the court appreciates that the defendant was in the public eye before the events that precipitated this case, it was not necessary for him to address this so publicly and to such an extent. By doing so, the court cannot credit his privacy interest as good cause to keep the case records sealed," the decision said. (NBC News)

Advertisement

In January, Smollett reported being attacked by two homophobic male President Trump supporters in Chicago in the middle of the night. The two suspects, brothers from Nigeria, eventually confessed to police that it was all a hoax and that Smollett had paid them to attack him. Prosecutors dropped all charges against the actor in March.

The same month, Trump tweeted that the DOJ and the FBI will be investigating the case.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement