Our Long Road to War With Iran
US Officials Warn That Iran Is Opening Up a New Front in the...
Globalize the Intifada? Authorities in the Netherlands Are Investigating Fire at Synagogue
What Can We Do About Islam in America?
More Questions Have Surfaced About Eric Swalwell's Eligibility to Run for California Gover...
All It Took for Democrats to Cave on DHS Funding Was Four Terrorist...
Fox News Just Found More Medicare Fraud in California
The New York City Council Is About to Make Things Even More Expensive...
Woman Launches GoFundMe to Help Her DoorDash Driver Finally Retire
Gavin Newsom's Early Release Law Just Set Criminal With 300-Year Sentence Free
Secretary Hegseth Provided an Update on Operation Epic Fury. Here's What He Said.
Here's More Proof Mamdani's Wife Has an Antisemitism Problem
They’re Losing. And They Know It.
Even Obama's Former DHS Secretary Is Calling on Democrats to Fund DHS
California Scrambles to Bolster Drone Defenses After FBI Warns Iran May Target West...
Tipsheet

Kamala Harris 'Vehemently' Defends Her Career as a Prosecutor Following New York Times Criticism

Kamala Harris 'Vehemently' Defends Her Career as a Prosecutor Following New York Times Criticism
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has championed herself as a progressive prosecutor. A New York Times contributor recently explained why "she's not." Lara Bazelon, an author and law professor, has been following Harris's career closely, and found multiple troubling examples from her tenure as both San Francisco’s district attorney and California attorney general to prove she did more harm than help to the liberal progressive cause.

Advertisement

Time after time, when progressives urged her to embrace criminal justice reforms as a district attorney and then the state’s attorney general, Ms. Harris opposed them or stayed silent. Most troubling, Ms. Harris fought tooth and nail to uphold wrongful convictions that had been secured through official misconduct that included evidence tampering, false testimony and the suppression of crucial information by prosecutors. (New York Times)

The writer cites a few examples to prove Harris was actually "regressive." In 2014, she appealed a federal judge's decision to make the death penalty unconstitutional and declined to take a position on Proposition 47, a ballot initiative that reduced certain low-level felonies to misdemeanors.

"Worst of all, though, is Ms. Harris’s record in wrongful conviction cases," Bazelon writes, before detailing a few cases in which Harris kept suspects in prison despite there being "compelling evidence" of their innocence. Bazelon regrets that Harris did not always use her power to "seek justice."

Progressives have taken issue with another of Harris's decisions as California AG. In 2015, she defended the Department of Corrections in its efforts to prevent transgender inmates from getting gender reassignment surgery. At a Martin Luther King, Jr. event on Monday, she tried to explain herself.

Advertisement

“I was the attorney general of California for two terms and I had a host of clients that I was obligated to defend and represent,” she said at Howard University. “I couldn’t fire my clients, and there were unfortunately situations that occurred where my clients took positions that were contrary to my beliefs.”

Harris insisted she did have the inmates' wellbeing in mind.

“On that issue, I will tell you I vehemently disagree and worked behind the scenes to ensure that the Department of Corrections would allow transitioning inmates to receive the medical attention that they required, needed and deserved."

Harris may have her share of progressive critics, but she also has plenty of fans who were over the moon to hear her finally, officially announce she's running for president in 2020. In the first 24 hours of her presidential announcement, the senator has already raised $1.5 million.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement