The Latest Trump Move Involving Minneapolis Is Going to Trigger a Lib Meltdown
Here’s Why That ICE Agent Involved in the Minneapolis Shooting Is in Hiding
Latest NYT Piece on Mamdani Shows How Being an American Liberal Is Just...
Decade-Long Manhunt Ends With Arrest of FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitive in Mexico
Ohio Physician Gets 5 Years in Prison for Role in $14.5M Medicare Fraud
Progressives Are Crying About the Lack of Deceptive Editing in Trump's Upcoming Interview
Delhi Man Sentenced to Federal Prison in Oregon for Illegally Exporting Aviation Technolog...
You're Gonna Need a Hazmat Suit to Listen to These Leftist Podcast Clips
Leftists Storm Minneapolis Church Hunting Alleged ICE Agent
Swalwell Vows to Punish ICE Officers If He Wins Governor's Seat
Iran’s Spiritual Revolution
Frey: Let Minneapolis Get Back to Running Daycares
You Won't Believe What These Hotels Are Doing to ICE Agents
Trump Questions Why Minnesotans Are Harassing ICE, Civilians
Men Need to Work
Tipsheet

Gorsuch Casts Deciding Vote on Immigration Case - It May Surprise You

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch's latest vote is confusing his conservative fans. In a case considering the deportation of an immigrant convicted of a felony, Gorsuch sided with the liberal justices in deciding to allow him to stay in the United States.

Advertisement

James Garcia Dimaya is a lawful resident who came to the U.S. from the Philippines at age 13. He was convicted of residential burglary in 2007 and 2009 and the Obama administration mandated that he be deported in 2010. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, noting that the term "aggravated felony" under the Immigration and Nationality Act was too vague.

The Supreme Court agreed with the 9th circuit. While conservatives may be frustrated by Gorsuch's vote, the court supposedly used the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia's reasoning in their opinion. In delivering the court's ruling, Justice Elena Kagan cited a 2015 ruling written by Scalia that struck down a clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act as unconstitutionally vague. That clause allowed past convictions to be viewed as violent felonies if they involved "conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another."

Advertisement

Related:

NEIL GORSUCH

Still, today's ruling is considered a defeat for the Trump administration, according to media.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement