This Fauci Diary Entry Will Cause Your Blood to Boil
The Enemies of the People
The Latest Winner of the British Citizen Award Makes a Mockery of Everything
The Fauci Diaries Have Press Running Away
Madison Now Has Its Own Autonomous Zone and It's As Bad As You'd...
Check Out Why Dems Wouldn't Let This Gubernatorial Candidate Speak at NYC's Dominican...
Tom Tiffany Slams Wisconsin Fact-Checkers Who Refuse to Question Francesca Hong
Francesca Hong's Campaign Just Got Busted for Lying About Her Views on the...
A Final Lindsey Graham Moment in D.C., South Carolina
Why Do Texas Democrats Keep Doing This to Themselves?
A Fraudster Scammed the Cash-Poor DNC Out of Tens of Thousands of Dollars
Tech Issue Grounds American Airlines Flights Nationwide
Documents Show That James Talarico Used Mother's House to Break Texas Election Law
Senate Confirms Tulsi Gabbard's Permanent Successor
Iran's 'Attempted Surprise Attack' Against American Military Stopped
Tipsheet

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

President Trump's judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett has been confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court, despite Democratic senators openly questioning her Catholic beliefs.

Advertisement

At Barrett's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) quoted some of the nominee's past reports, concluding that the "dogma lives loudly" within her. The Democrat shared her concern that Barrett's confirmation may threaten the "super precedent" of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in 1973.

Durbin shared her concern, asking her point blank if she was an "orthodox Catholic."

Nevertheless, Barrett was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 55-43.

She survived the religious test, but now another of Trump's judicial nominees is facing resistance for his faith. The American Bar Association takes issue with Omaha attorney Steve Grasz, nominated for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, because of his past pro-life writings. 

“Many questioned whether Mr. Grasz would be able to detach himself from his deeply held social agenda and political loyalty to be able to judge objectively, with compassion and without bias,” according to the statement by Pam Bresnahan, chairwoman of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary.

Advertisement

Grasz's confirmation hearing got underway Wednesday morning. Like Barrett, he was interrogated about his record on abortion rights from the more liberal committee members, but insisted he would not let his personal convictions affect his rulings.

Republican senators came to Grasz's defense, arguing that the ABA report was "ridiculous" and biased.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement