Donna Brazile Calls on Graham Platner to Drop Out So He Can Do...
CNN Was Just Incapable of Enjoying the 4th of July—but They Were Not...
Alicia Keys Doesn't Want Women to Have Equal Rights
Despite New Allegations, Cenk Uygur Continues to Defend Graham Platner
The Hill Clutches Pearls About Vice President Vance's Book Royalties
Here's the Despicable Reason Why MS NOW Says Platner's Latest Accuser Is More...
Meet the Man Preserving the Stories of World War II Veterans
Here's the Most Deranged Reaction to the FIFA Red Card Retraction
We're Officially the World's Most Hated Soccer Team
The U.S. Has Been Eliminated in the World Cup After a Historic Run
How Did This Mistake Already Happen Again?
Sen. John Fetterman Blasts Graham Platner's Backers After Newest Allegation
This Democrat Senator Was Cheering For Mexico in the World Cup
The View's Sunny Hostin Claims American Flags Make Her Feel 'Unsafe'
Platner Loses Major Endorsements After Sexual Assault Allegation
Tipsheet

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

President Trump's judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett has been confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court, despite Democratic senators openly questioning her Catholic beliefs.

Advertisement

At Barrett's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) quoted some of the nominee's past reports, concluding that the "dogma lives loudly" within her. The Democrat shared her concern that Barrett's confirmation may threaten the "super precedent" of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in 1973.

Durbin shared her concern, asking her point blank if she was an "orthodox Catholic."

Nevertheless, Barrett was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 55-43.

She survived the religious test, but now another of Trump's judicial nominees is facing resistance for his faith. The American Bar Association takes issue with Omaha attorney Steve Grasz, nominated for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, because of his past pro-life writings. 

“Many questioned whether Mr. Grasz would be able to detach himself from his deeply held social agenda and political loyalty to be able to judge objectively, with compassion and without bias,” according to the statement by Pam Bresnahan, chairwoman of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary.

Advertisement

Grasz's confirmation hearing got underway Wednesday morning. Like Barrett, he was interrogated about his record on abortion rights from the more liberal committee members, but insisted he would not let his personal convictions affect his rulings.

Republican senators came to Grasz's defense, arguing that the ABA report was "ridiculous" and biased.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement