The Left Were Absolute Psychopaths Following the Attack on the WHCA Dinner
WHCA Dinner Shooter Revealed Who He Was Targeting During His Attempt to Storm...
As Trump Responds to the WHCA Dinner Attack, a Lot of New Details...
Is This the WHCA Dinner Shooter? If So, He's a Kamala Harris Supporter
President Trump Was Just Escorted Out Of the WHCA Dinner
Democrats Have Always Created Racism and Always Will
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 317: What the Bible says about Blood –...
The 'No Kings' Movement Is Sheer Hypocrisy
Yeah, They Really Do Hate America
We Need a Second Fox-Like TV Network
Special Rights: The Quiet Assault on Equal Justice
St. Louis Woman Sentenced to 3 Years for Stealing $2.3M From Children's Meal...
Man Charged With Running Illegal Alien Harboring Scheme Through Japanese Steakhouse Chain...
SPLC Indictment Threatens to Derail Benson's Run for Michigan Governor
Two Officers Shot in Chicago Hospital Shooting
Tipsheet

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

President Trump's judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett has been confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court, despite Democratic senators openly questioning her Catholic beliefs.

Advertisement

At Barrett's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) quoted some of the nominee's past reports, concluding that the "dogma lives loudly" within her. The Democrat shared her concern that Barrett's confirmation may threaten the "super precedent" of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in 1973.

Durbin shared her concern, asking her point blank if she was an "orthodox Catholic."

Nevertheless, Barrett was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 55-43.

She survived the religious test, but now another of Trump's judicial nominees is facing resistance for his faith. The American Bar Association takes issue with Omaha attorney Steve Grasz, nominated for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, because of his past pro-life writings. 

“Many questioned whether Mr. Grasz would be able to detach himself from his deeply held social agenda and political loyalty to be able to judge objectively, with compassion and without bias,” according to the statement by Pam Bresnahan, chairwoman of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary.

Advertisement

Grasz's confirmation hearing got underway Wednesday morning. Like Barrett, he was interrogated about his record on abortion rights from the more liberal committee members, but insisted he would not let his personal convictions affect his rulings.

Republican senators came to Grasz's defense, arguing that the ABA report was "ridiculous" and biased.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos