Wait, That's What Set Off Libs About Abigail Spanberger's SOTU Response? You're Gonna...
The Vibes for the US Men's Hockey Team Are So High, We Got...
Canadians Are Having a Rough Week
Iranian Students Torch Regime’s Symbols As Protests Erupt on Colleges
FedEx Wants a Refund for Trump's Tariffs – an International Court Will Decide
Look Who Ro Khanna Is Bringing to the State of the Union Tonight
Tom Tiffany Fires Back After Evers Says Wisconsin Would ‘Implode’ Without Illegal Immigran...
Dana Bash Pulls No Punches in Her Interview With Gavin Newsom
Is Time Running Out for Sanctuary Cities?
Gun Rights Group Wants Explanation From Anti-Gunner Bloomberg Over Epstein Ties
Dan Bongino Goes Nuclear on Candace Owens
Speaker Johnson Slams Democrats for Holding Five Counter-Events to Trump’s State of the...
Dan Bongino on the Mexican Cartels: The Donroe Doctrine Is Not a Joke...
SURPRISE: Guess What Thomas Massie Is Doing for the State of the Union
The Career of Tim Walz Is Over, and He Intends to Destroy Gun...
Tipsheet

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

Another Trump Judicial Nominee Called Unqualified for Pro-life Beliefs

President Trump's judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett has been confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court, despite Democratic senators openly questioning her Catholic beliefs.

Advertisement

At Barrett's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) quoted some of the nominee's past reports, concluding that the "dogma lives loudly" within her. The Democrat shared her concern that Barrett's confirmation may threaten the "super precedent" of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in 1973.

Durbin shared her concern, asking her point blank if she was an "orthodox Catholic."

Nevertheless, Barrett was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 55-43.

She survived the religious test, but now another of Trump's judicial nominees is facing resistance for his faith. The American Bar Association takes issue with Omaha attorney Steve Grasz, nominated for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, because of his past pro-life writings. 

“Many questioned whether Mr. Grasz would be able to detach himself from his deeply held social agenda and political loyalty to be able to judge objectively, with compassion and without bias,” according to the statement by Pam Bresnahan, chairwoman of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary.

Advertisement

Grasz's confirmation hearing got underway Wednesday morning. Like Barrett, he was interrogated about his record on abortion rights from the more liberal committee members, but insisted he would not let his personal convictions affect his rulings.

Republican senators came to Grasz's defense, arguing that the ABA report was "ridiculous" and biased.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement