Kash Patel Becomes the Focus of Media Analysis They Consistently Get Wrong
How America Has Destroyed Its Democracy, Part Two: The Aristocracy of Merit
Three Congressional Missteps on Healthcare
Today’s Qualifications to Be President of the U.S.
Climate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
Ukraine's Bureaucrats Are Finishing What China Started
Rising Federal Debt: Why Strategic Planning Matters More Than Ever for High-Net-Worth Fami...
Classroom Political Activism Shifts a Teacher’s Role from Educator to Indoctrinator
As America Celebrates 250, We Must Help Iran Celebrate Another 2,500
Guatemalan Citizen Admits Using Stolen Identity to Obtain Custody of Teen Migrant
Oregon-Based Utility PacifiCorp Settles for $575M Over Six Devastating Wildfires
Armed Man Rammed Substation Near Las Vegas in Apparent Terror Plot Before Committing...
DOJ Moves to Strip U.S. Citizenship From Former North Miami Mayor Over Immigration...
DOJ Probes Three Michigan School Districts That Allegedly Teach Gender Ideology
5th Circuit Vacates Ruling That Blocked Louisiana's Mandate to Display 10 Commandments in...
Tipsheet

Proof Justice Kennedy Is Retiring?

Proof Justice Kennedy Is Retiring?

One paragraph hiding in an NPR piece has scholars wondering if Justice Anthony Kennedy is looking for a way out of his Supreme Court seat. 

Rumors were already swirling for some time, but Nina Totenberg just fanned the flames.

Advertisement
But it is unlikely that Kennedy will remain on the court for the full four years of the Trump presidency. While he long ago hired his law clerks for the coming term, he has not done so for the following term (beginning Oct. 2018), and has let applicants for those positions know he is considering retirement.

(NPR)

Retiring justices tend to only hire one clerk, as the New York Magazine points out. Ruth Bader Ginsburg appears determined to stay put, considering she has already chosen her clerks through 2020.

Should Kennedy retire, President Trump will have the opportunity to appoint another conservative justice. His choice in Neil Gorsuch to replace Antonin Scalia was apparently a home run for conservatives, judging by The New York Times's recent editorial. In it, the editors note Gorsuch seems to have no plans to compromise. 

Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., a staunch conservative in his own right, often seeks out points of compromise among the justices. On June 26, the court’s last opinion day, Justice Gorsuch appeared to be having none of it.
Advertisement

June 26, of course, was the day the court ruled in Trinity Lutheran Church's favor, declaring that the state of Missouri had no right to deny the religious institution access to its tire scrap program. In his opinion, Gorsuch wrote that, “The general principles here do not permit discrimination against religious exercise — whether on the playground or anywhere else.”

The Times made sure to also note that "by rights," Gorsuch's seat should be occupied by Judge Merrick Garland, President Obama's nominee.

If Trump does get another vacancy on the court, expect him to return to this list of experienced judges.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement