President Trump Is Right About Tim Walz
This Media Outlet Just Sued the Pentagon Over its New Policy
Tim Walz Can Dish It Out, but He Can't Take It
Guess How Many Democrats Voted Against Protecting Our Schools From Chinese Influence
Pope Leo Tells Europeans Worried About Islam to Be Less Fearful
Occam's Bazooka
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD...
Federal Jury Finds Texas Resident Guilty in $150K PEMEX Bribery Plot
Another Person Stabbed on Charlotte Light Rail; Illegal Alien Arrested
The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Illegal Alien, Son Arrested for Allegedly Trafficking 75 Firearms
Man Who Set Fire To Train With Victim Inside Face 40 Years in...
Former High-Level DEA Official Charged With Narcoterrorism in Alleged Plot to Aid CJNG...
Florida Man Convicted of Attempted Murder of Two Federal Officers in ATF Raid
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Rejects North Carolina Voter ID Case

The Supreme Court has denied a case involving the controversial North Carolina voter ID law. In the court’s decision, Chief Justice John Roberts explained it was unclear who represented the state. Therefore, a federal appeals court ruling that struck down key parts of the law will remain in place.

Advertisement

In the federal appeals court decision, the judges concluded that the voter ID law was discriminatory.

The court found that all five restrictions “disproportionately affected African-Americans.” The law’s voter identification provision, for instance, “retained only those types of photo ID disproportionately held by whites and excluded those disproportionately held by African-Americans.”

The North Carolina law mandated, in part, a stricter form of voter identification, that early voting be rolled back from 17 to 10 days, and an elimination of same-day registration.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged the law a few years ago, applauded the Supreme Court's decision Monday.

“This law, enacted with what the appeals court called discriminatory intent and ‘almost surgical precision’ targeting African-American voters, is meeting its much-deserved demise,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “An ugly chapter in voter suppression is finally closing.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement