China’s 90-Day Energy Trap
Iran Shows Why Louisiana’s Energy Industry Must Be Protected
Opposing Tariffs Is Not Conservative Policy
The Mother of All Shakedowns: California Reparations
Whose ‘Stolen’ Land Is It, Anyway?
Defense of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea Requires Air Superiority
The Future of the Dean Dome: Tradition, Stewardship and Carolina Basketball's Next Chapter
Iranian Women’s Courage Must Not Be Forgotten on International Women’s Day, Part 1
One Historic Town Dismisses the Pledge of Allegiance
Pink Slips for DEI and ESG?
This Republican Lawmaker Is Reportedly Retiring After This Term
IRGC Operative Convicted in Plot to Assassinate U.S. Officials, Including Trump
U.S. Seeks to Seize $15M Allegedly Linked to Iranian Oil Shipping Network
Would a John Lujan Nomination Cost Republicans TX-35?
Minnesota Democrat Lawmaker Urges Studying 'the Benefits of Shoplifting and Retail Theft'
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Rejects North Carolina Voter ID Case

Supreme Court Rejects North Carolina Voter ID Case

The Supreme Court has denied a case involving the controversial North Carolina voter ID law. In the court’s decision, Chief Justice John Roberts explained it was unclear who represented the state. Therefore, a federal appeals court ruling that struck down key parts of the law will remain in place.

Advertisement

In the federal appeals court decision, the judges concluded that the voter ID law was discriminatory.

The court found that all five restrictions “disproportionately affected African-Americans.” The law’s voter identification provision, for instance, “retained only those types of photo ID disproportionately held by whites and excluded those disproportionately held by African-Americans.”

The North Carolina law mandated, in part, a stricter form of voter identification, that early voting be rolled back from 17 to 10 days, and an elimination of same-day registration.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged the law a few years ago, applauded the Supreme Court's decision Monday.

“This law, enacted with what the appeals court called discriminatory intent and ‘almost surgical precision’ targeting African-American voters, is meeting its much-deserved demise,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “An ugly chapter in voter suppression is finally closing.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement