Ryan Routh Has Been Sentenced After Failed Assassination Attempt on Trump
You Won't Believe What Nancy Pelosi Told Don Lemon After His Arrest
We Now Know Whether ICE Will Show Up to the Super Bowl
You're Gonna Laugh Your Head Off When You Find Out Why Jasmine Crockett's...
Antisemitic Incidents Skyrocket on Mamdani's Watch
Nate Morris Surges Double Digits in the KY Senate Race After Backing of...
Roy Cooper's Soft-on-Crime Policies Released Iryna Zarutska's Murderer
Media Critique of Firearm Industry Protection Bill Misses Major Point
Ninth Circuit Has Questions About California's Gun Store Surveillance Law
This Law Firm Says Singer's Admission of 'Stolen Land’ Gives Native American Tribe...
Comedian Ben Bankas Has Six Sold-Out Minnesota Shows Canceled Due to a Renee...
House Hearing Explodes as Rep. Meeks Shouts at Scott Bessent: 'Stop Covering for...
Mamdani Offers 'Free' Legal Help for Haitian TPS Holders
Maxine Waters Loses It During House Hearing, Smacked Down by Treasury Secretary Bessent
Warning Signs for Republicans in 2026
Tipsheet

Fourth Circuit Judge: Trump Never Apologized for Muslim Ban Comments

The Fourth Circuit court heard arguments for President Trump’s revised travel order Monday, which temporarily bans visitors from six Middle Eastern and African nations. Of particular concern for some of the justices was Trump’s rhetoric about Muslims. Why, Judge Robert King wondered, was the president’s controversial remarks about Muslims still posted on his website?

Advertisement

King added that several of Trump’s comments against Muslims were still on his campaign website when the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued its injunction against the ban.

“He’s never repudiated what he said about the Muslim ban,” King said of Trump.

Conservative Judge Paul Niemeyer pushed back at these assumptions. At one point, he challenged American Civil Liberties Union attorney Omar Jadwat, who believed the travel order was drafted with an intent to discriminate against Muslims, arguing that the countries listed on the ban pose no credible security risk. Niemeyer sensed a partisan bias, however.

“If some other candidate had won the election and issued this order, I gather you would have no problem with that,” he predicted.

Jadwat admitted as much.

Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall defended Trump’s travel ban during the hearing, insisting his statements as a presidential candidate should not cloud the current order.

Trump "made it clear he was not talking about Muslims all over the world, that's why it's not a Muslim ban," Wall said.

Advertisement

The travel order also got some attention at the Sally Yates hearing Monday. Yates, the former acting attorney general, explained to a Senate Judiciary subcommittee that she could not enforce the president's travel ban because she believed it was unconstitutional. That remark engendered a fiery exchange between her and Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), who sarcastically wondered out loud who made her a Supreme Court justice.

The Trump administration needs to claim victory in the Virginia and Seattle appeals courts in order to put the travel ban into effect.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos