John Cornyn Will Be a Texas Thom Tillis and That’s Awful
DNI Gabbard Issues Criminal Referrals Regarding the Dems' 2019 Trump Impeachment Push
Idiot Math
AI Nude Deepfakes Becoming a Dire Issue in Schools
Pocahontas Wants to Spend Jeff Bezos’s Money
The Pope, Three Cardinals, and the Iran War
In Israel, Garbage Trucks Bring the Garbage
The Implosion of Eric Swalwell: What Was He Thinking?
Debunking Five Tax Day Myths
My Advice to (Young) Women
Immigration in America: Legal Pathways, Border Reality, and the Fight Over Who Belongs
Trump’s Hormuz Masterstroke: How American Energy Dominance Is Exposing China’s Fatal Weakn...
New York Can’t Claim 'Choice' While Silencing It
U.S. Secret Service Seized 13 Card Skimmers in Dallas, Saving $13.5M in Fraud
Six House Republicans Vote to Advance Temporary Protected Status to Haitians for Three...
Tipsheet

Fourth Circuit Judge: Trump Never Apologized for Muslim Ban Comments

Fourth Circuit Judge: Trump Never Apologized for Muslim Ban Comments

The Fourth Circuit court heard arguments for President Trump’s revised travel order Monday, which temporarily bans visitors from six Middle Eastern and African nations. Of particular concern for some of the justices was Trump’s rhetoric about Muslims. Why, Judge Robert King wondered, was the president’s controversial remarks about Muslims still posted on his website?

Advertisement

King added that several of Trump’s comments against Muslims were still on his campaign website when the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued its injunction against the ban.

“He’s never repudiated what he said about the Muslim ban,” King said of Trump.

Conservative Judge Paul Niemeyer pushed back at these assumptions. At one point, he challenged American Civil Liberties Union attorney Omar Jadwat, who believed the travel order was drafted with an intent to discriminate against Muslims, arguing that the countries listed on the ban pose no credible security risk. Niemeyer sensed a partisan bias, however.

“If some other candidate had won the election and issued this order, I gather you would have no problem with that,” he predicted.

Jadwat admitted as much.

Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall defended Trump’s travel ban during the hearing, insisting his statements as a presidential candidate should not cloud the current order.

Trump "made it clear he was not talking about Muslims all over the world, that's why it's not a Muslim ban," Wall said.

Advertisement

The travel order also got some attention at the Sally Yates hearing Monday. Yates, the former acting attorney general, explained to a Senate Judiciary subcommittee that she could not enforce the president's travel ban because she believed it was unconstitutional. That remark engendered a fiery exchange between her and Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), who sarcastically wondered out loud who made her a Supreme Court justice.

The Trump administration needs to claim victory in the Virginia and Seattle appeals courts in order to put the travel ban into effect.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement