The FBI Used One Word That's Likely to Draw More Criticism in Latest...
Police Arrest Man for Allegedly Breaking Into NYC Mayor Eric Adams' Home
Mosque Near New Orleans Terrorist's Home Sends Out Message to Attendees
Police Just Raided Yet Another Eric Adams Ally
Republicans Poised to Change House Speaker Rules and Democrats Are Not Happy About...
Spree Shooter Kills 12 in Montenegro Before Turning Gun on Himself
Why Security Bollards Were Not Raised on Bourbon Street During New Year's Day...
The Airbnb the Bourbon Street Terrorist Rented Caught on Fire
Leftist Magazine Tries to Claim Vance in Category of Those 'Born to Immense...
Must See: CBS Reporter Rips Dems Over Lie-Filled SCOTUS Delegitimization Campaign
Newsom Applauded One of Trump's Immigration Stances
Hamas May Want to Release the Hostages After This Latest Warning Message
Biden Will Award Liz Cheney With This Medal
Flashback: That Other Time a Damning Photo of a Democrat Was Also Suppressed
'You White B*tches, Go Back to Europe!': Pro-Hamas Protestors Descend on NYC
Tipsheet

Feinstein: Why Didn't Comey Get a Search Warrant Before Clinton Email Announcement?

At Wednesday's Senate Judiciary hearing, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) let FBI Director James Comey know how disappointed she was in his decision to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails 11 days before the 2016 presidential election after finding thousands more of Clinton's emails on Anthony Weiner's computer. That announcement torpedoed Clinton's campaign, Feinstein argued.

Advertisement

In an interview on CNN, she echoed her sentiment, wondering why Comey didn't make more of an effort to search the laptop in question before writing Congress the FBI was revisiting the investigation?

Instead, “a great injustice was done,” Feinstein said.

“There was nothing in that computer,” she continued. “It impacted the election. I think everyone agrees with that in one way or another.”

Despite Feinstein and other Democrats' qualms with Comey's timeline, the FBI director said he'd do it all over again because concealing the new information would have been "catastrophic."

"It makes me mildly nauseous to think that we may have had some impact on the election, but honestly it wouldn't have changed the decision," he said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement