When the Law Is Optional, You Have Tyranny
The US Men's Hockey Team Got a Call After Beating Canada Yesterday. You...
The Reactions to Team USA's Win Over Canada Were Amazing, But This One...
This Tweet From Kyle Rittenhouse About Trans Folk and ICE Will Surely Trigger...
Virginia Tech Professor's Hate Crime Allegation Turned Out to Be a Total Hoax
ESPN Is Replacing Sunday Night Baseball With...What Now?!
The Olympics Have Ended. We Should End Sports ‘Journalism,’ Too.
Your Kid Doesn’t Need Sushi. He Needs to Hear the Word ‘No.’
Leaked DNC Autopsy of 2024 Election Blames This for Kamala's Loss to President...
Tony Evers Just Guaranteed Wisconsin Energy Bills Will Skyrocket for the Next 20...
Mamdani Defends Shoveling ID Requirements As Few New Yorkers Sign Up to Dig...
Gavin Newsom's Attempt to Connect With Black Voters Was Incredibly Racist
They Mean Retribution
The Poison of Marxist Leftism
You Should Be Terrorized by What JPMorgan Did to Trump
Tipsheet

Rand Paul: If Rice’s Snooping Wasn’t Political…Why Wasn’t FBI Involved?

Rand Paul: If Rice’s Snooping Wasn’t Political…Why Wasn’t FBI Involved?

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) believes Susan Rice did not sufficiently answer Andrea Mitchell’s questions on Tuesday. When the MSNBC anchor pressed the former national security adviser over whether she spied on the Trump transition team and unmasked their names for political purposes, Rice said surveillance was well within her job description.

Advertisement

“We only do it to protect the American people and to do our jobs," she told Mitchell, adding she never “leaked nothing to nobody.” 

“I don’t think she answered the question,” Paul said on Fox News Wednesday.

If it wasn’t for political reasons and she was really seeking the information for foreign intelligence reasons, Paul wondered, then why wasn’t the FBI involved?

He had more questions.

“Did the president direct you to eavesdrop and sift through intelligence?” Paul asked, wondering if President Obama was behind the privacy breach.

Paul, who is known as a champion for Americans’ privacy, said the situation raises too many constitutional alarm bells.

“We need to protect American privacy,” he said. “We can’t let political partisans search through databases.”

Paul is demanding Rice testify in front of a grand jury and explain why her actions weren’t political.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement