Gretchen Whitmer Seems to Have Audio Issues Any Time She's Pressed by the...
NYT Opinion Writer: 'What Have We Liberals Done to the West Coast?'
Joe Biden Reminds Us To Buy Guns and Ammunition
Why Biden's Staff Might Be Supremely Irritated With Obama Right Now
Who Is 'Wanda The Stuffer'? And Why Did She Get Arrested.
A Biden Spokesperson Did Not Just Say *That* to Explain Joe's Wandering Off...
I Can’t Stand These Democrats, Part 4
The Climate Movement Cannibalizes Itself
President Benedict Arnold
The Need for the Electoral College as Illustrated by Baseball
Morning Joe Has Become America's Baghdad Bob
The Losses Can Never Fully Be Calculated
Do Daddies Really Matter Within America’s Court System?
Biden Admin to Announce Largest Relief Program for Millions of Illegal Immigrants
Pro-Hamas Agitators Show Up to Ted Cruz's Home for the 23rd Time

McAuliffe Considers Reinstating Dangerous Parole to ‘Safeguard’ Taxpayer Dollars

There are many ways for a governor to ensure he or she is not wasting their constituents’ hard earned money, and easing prison sentencing so dangerous criminals can return society for a quicker ‘rehabilitation’ is not one of them.


Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) is considering reinstating parole in the Old Dominion. He introduced a Parole Review and Update Commission and signed an executive order to review the parole process on Thursday, following up his action with a string of questions.

“It’s time to review whether that makes sense. Is it keeping our citizens safe? Is it a reasonable, good, cost-effective way? Are we rehabilitating folks?” he said. “Are sentences too long for nonviolent offenses? Are we keeping people in prison too long?”

If McAuliffe decides the answer to that last question is “yes,” Virginia could return to the days when criminals faced only one-fourth of their sentences, former Virginia Gov. George Allen (R) argued. Allen abolished parole in 1994 when the country had a tough-on-crime mentality. He let McAuliffe know what he thought of his new parole study in a Facebook post Thursday.

“It will be interesting to see which specific felons that this Commission thinks should be released sooner, I doubt that most jurors, dedicated law officers, judges, victims and their families want to revert to the dangerously lenient, dishonest system of early release. And, there's a real societal cost to crime that this Commission should consider, and they should avoid sanctimonious, blissful wishing away of the principle of holding criminals personally responsibility for their acts.”

Yet, McAuliffe asserts that reintroducing parole for prisoners is an effective way to protect taxpayer money.


In the interview with WTOP (103.5 FM), McAuliffe said it is his job to protect citizens, but also safeguard taxpayer dollars. The state houses 30,369 inmates at a cost of $27,462 per year per inmate and a total of $833 million annually, he said. Inmates must serve at least 85 percent of their sentences before they can be released for good behavior.

“The question now, 20 years later, is has it made us safer or have we spent a lot of money and we haven’t done what we need to do for rehabilitation?” he said.

I’d like to make my own suggestion: Protecting actual taxpayers is a bit more important than protecting their wallets. In other states like Indiana, many prisoners are quick to return to a life of crime soon after their early releases.

Gov. Allen’s parole abolition helped to steady the crime rate in Virginia. He warned McAuliffe to not threaten this positive trend.

Virginia Performs indicates that the Commonwealth has remained well below the national property crime average for over a decade, and we rank 8th lowest in the country. When Governor McAuliffe was elected, Virginia had the third lowest violent crime rate in the nation. Those are positive results of our public safety reforms and there should be no backtracking.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos