It Seems Like We Need to Look Into This Regarding the Dems' Candidate...
Speaker Johnson Had a Legislative Hat Trick Today While Thune Wants to Sell...
Police Chief Secretly Installs AI Surveillance Cameras, Then Justifies It After Getting Bu...
Turns Out New Jersey's Voter Fraud Hurts Immigrants, Too
New NRCC Ad Blasts Socialist Amish Shah As Dangerous for Arizona Families
Who Are the Bullies Again?
Abdul El-Sayed Is Losing Black Voters, So the Damage Control Has Begun
WisDems Are Begging for an Early Voting Ballot Do-Over
Press Struggles With Immigrant Voting It Denies Happening; 'The View' Has Its Dress...
Minnesota Man Sentenced to 30 Months for $1.18M Tax Refund Scheme
70th Defendant Pleads Guilty in $250 Million Feeding Our Future Fraud
Maryland Audit: $2 Million Lottery Winner Kept Collecting Food Stamps
Day 12: U.S. Pounds Iran to Protect Ships in Strait of Hormuz
Rashida Tlaib Goes to Bat for Mamdani, Says She'll Help Arrest Netanyahu
New Jersey Man Sentenced to 48 Months in $4 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments in Little Sisters of the Poor Case

Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments in Little Sisters of the Poor Case

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case Zubik v. Burwell (a consolidation of seven cases regarding the HHS Contraception Mandate) starting today, Wednesday, March 23. This case is one that has been watched with intense scrutiny since Justice Antonin Scalia passed away in February.

Advertisement

Perhaps the most famous figures in this case are the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of women religious who operate homes for the elderly poor. The sisters filed suit against the mandate in September of 2013. Despite being a Catholic religious order, the sisters do not qualify for a religious exemption to the HHS Contraception Mandate as they do not serve nor employ exclusively Catholics, and care for people of all faith traditions.

Ahead of the oral arguments, Speaker Paul Ryan took to the floor to voice his support for the Little Sisters and their right to not be forced to violate their vows.

A decision is expected in the case this June.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement