It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
There Was a Horrific School Shooting in Canada...and Their Police Used a Weird...
Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Fraud Nation
Technological Sweet Spot
Public Opinion: A Tyrant Against Hard Decisions
Peggy Noonan Loses Her Noodle Over Washington Post Layoffs
Misconduct Rampant: America’s Leaders Increasingly Prioritize Agendas Over Fairness, Laws
Pass the SAVE America Act
Trump's DOJ Seeks Justice for Victims of Benghazi
2026 Olympics: Let’s Talk About Crotch Scandals
The Washington Post Is Paying the Bill for Free Speech
Republicans Siding With Big Banks in Stablecoin Fight Could Tank Trump’s Affordability Age...
Freezing Deaths, Garbage Piles in Largest Sanctuary City
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
Tipsheet

Obama's Trip to Paris For Global Warming Summit Sure Emitted a Lot of Greenhouse Gases

Pres. Obama and a host of other world leaders convened in Paris this week to discuss the environment at the United Nations Climate Change summit. While Justin already wrote about the exorbitant cost of the meal the world leaders would be enjoying, the Daily Caller did the math and found that the president's trip to Paris would emit more carbon dioxide than 72 cars--over a year.

Advertisement

Obama’s Paris jaunt will send more CO2 into the atmosphere than 31 American homes‘ energy usage for an entire year. The president’s trip is equivalent to burning 368,331 pounds of coal or 797 barrels of oil, according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s carbon footprint calculator.

Just one leg of the president’s Sunday trip to Paris emitted 189 tons of CO2 after travelling 3,855 miles and burning 19,275 gallons of jet fuel, according to Daily Caller News Foundation calculations based on past presidential flights. Obama’s return flight to Washington, D.C., would double the amount of CO2 burned to 378 tons — more than 72 cars driving for a year.

It's perfectly fine to care about the environment, and steps should be taken to avoid needless pollution. I think it's rather hypocritical for the United Nations to ask for world leaders to travel (with large entourages) to a location to discuss the environment, rather than hold the conference in a much greener method. It's 2015--video conferencing exists. Having the world leaders stay home and conserve energy and conferencing in this manner would be a unique, albeit one with far fewer photo ops, way for the United Nations to promote environmentalism.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement