BREAKING: A Helicopter Carrying Iran's President Has Crashed
Former Ted Cruz Communications Director and CNN Commentator Alice Stewart Has Died
How Trump Reacted to a Dysfunctional Podium in Minnesota
What Caused Marjorie Taylor Green and Jasmine Crockett to Rip Into Each Other
Bill Maher Nails What's at the Heart of the Left's Outrage Over Harrison...
Whoever Edited This Clip About Biden Deserves Major Props...And Trump Certainly Noticed It
Washington Is High School With Paychecks
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 218: What the Bible Says About Brokenness
MSNBC Legal Analyst Thinks Blaming Bob Menendez’s Wife Is a Good Tactic
Russia Warns U.S. Is 'Playing With Fire' in Its Continued Support for Ukraine
Good Teaching Requires the Right Ingredients
Trump Indictments Have Ignited a Juggernaut of a Presidential Campaign
Peru Moves To Treat Bizarre Delusions of Transgender Ideology
Colombian Illegal Alien Wanted for Homicide Captured in Massachusetts
Trump: Biden Will Be ‘Jacked Up’ During Debate

Squinting at the Tea Leaves

Disclaimer: No one outside the Court knows what the Supremes are doing.  Those who talk don't know, those who know don't talk.  And no one can predict a case's outcome from oral arguments.

But if it's true -- as Politico suggests -- that Justice Ginsburg is authoring a dissenting health care opinion, that's great news for ObamaCare opponents.  She is clearly disposed to uphold ObamaCare; her status as the most senior justice among the Court's predictably liberal bloc (i.e., herself and Justices Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan) would guarantee she would have the prerogative to craft the dissent (and she would no doubt seek to do so in the tradition of former Justice Brennan, who wrote dissents designed to be used to support majority opinions in future cases).

Justice Sotomayor, who displayed some skepticism about the law during oral argument could win great points for intellectual independence by voting to strike down ObamaCare -- but the fallout from the liberal community would be so intense that my guess is she won't.

To my mind, the fact that Justice Kennedy authored the opinion that was largely favorable to The White House on the Arizona immigration statute is also a positive sign.  Justice Kennedy cares greatly about his standing in the elite-liberal establishment, and I suspect he would go to great trouble to "balance" striking down ObamaCare with an opinion more likely to be palatable to The New York Times.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos