Men Are Going to Strike Back
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ As Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Tipsheet

California's Shame

As is its custom, The New York Times has run another sob story about the very real and harsh consequences of California budget cuts on the state's universities
Advertisement
, which used to constitute the gold standard.

What is conspicuously absent is any explanation of why such draconian cuts are necessary.  Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that the average state worker retiring in 1999 with full benefits collects $67,000 per year?

California's government is characterized by oppressive, job-killing nanny state regulation and outrageous indulgence of its state employees.  So much has been spent where it doesn't belong that there are no more funds left for matters -- like universities -- that serve all Californians and are within the proper scope of government.

Until there is real, meaningful pension reform in California, it will continue to go the way of Greece.  And there will continue to be great suffering there . . . and two classes of people: The taxed, serving class -- and the entitled, governing class.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement