Men Are Going to Strike Back
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ As Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Tipsheet

The "Compromise": Just Hard, Raw Politics

Below, Katie outlines the substance of the ObamaCare contraception/abortifacient "compromise" that really isn't one (how can there be a true "compromise" if both sides haven't agreed to it?).
Advertisement

But even setting that aside -- even if the compromise were somehow acceptable and mutually-agreed-upon -- it's worth pointing out that the administration isn't trying to compromise because it now respects liberty of conscience.  It isn't trying to compromise because there's a new understanding of (though not agreement with) Catholic (or other religious) morality about abortion and contraception.  Instead, it's trying to compromise only to stanch the self-inflicted, hemorrhaging wound the President created through his approval of draconian rules that constitute an assault on religious freedom in America.

Here's the takeaway, whatever the purported "compromise" looks like: Obama -- and the other liberals like him -- are willing to trample conscience rights and religious liberties in order to impose their vision of "the good" on Americans.  What everyone should keep in mind is that this crowd was willing to ride roughshod over religious belief and religious pluralism in this country.  If they fail, it's only because they were forced to retreat.

In fact, from a purely political perspective, the administration's only "mistake" was taking on headlong an adversary -- the Catholic Church -- big enough, wily enough, principled enough and tenacious enough to fight back effectively.  It's a good thing for our cherished First Amendment religious rights that they did.  Had the administration picked a smaller, less experienced or less vocal faith to attack, too many of us might not have been alert to the danger until it was too late.
Advertisement

Then again, it isn't entirely surprising.  There is some very ugly anti-Catholic sentiment that occasionally manifests itself among the liberal "intelligentsia" (as this repugnant Santorum hit piece reveals -- HT: Hugh Hewitt), and it's hard not to suspect that this ugly sentiment lurks in the hearts of at least some of those most determined to implement the abortifacient/contraception-mandating ObamaCare regs.  Perhaps it's time for us all to have as open a discussion on the evils of anti-religious bigotry as we do on the evils of racism, sexism and homophobia.

The real question for Americans is: How can we trust an administration that has shown such a stunningly contemptuous disregard for religious principles with which it disagrees -- and religious liberty in general?


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement