Nobody’s Calling London
CNN Produces a Romance Thriller for the NYC Bombers, and David French Backs...
The Democrats’ Republic of Iran
Should the Supreme Court Reconsider New York Times v. Sullivan?
Do Public Schools Need a 'Jan. 6 Insurrection' Course?
Fix What's Broken at Home so We Can Defend Ourselves Abroad
Blue-State Suicide
Protect the Border and the Ballot Box
The Sin of Accepting Support From Jews
Iran’s New Supreme Leader: The Rise of Mojtaba Khamenei
Is Proof of Citizenship Really Jim Crow 2.0
A Landmark Verdict Sparks the Collapse of Youth Gender-Affirming Surgeries, but True Justi...
SAVE Act Lifted by Paxton-Cornyn Race
The Left Is Really Mad That We Bought Our Troops Steak and Lobster...
Trump Is Bringing Historic Changes to the U.S. Energy Sector
Tipsheet

You'll Eat Salad -- and You'll Like It

You'll Eat Salad -- and You'll Like It
Jim Geraghty recounts an absolutely amazing anecdote from Richard Wolffe's book, wherein President Obama essentially forces an overweight staffer to eat salad for lunch.
Advertisement

Seriously.  

All this goes along with the recurring meme of the Obamas' food obsession.  In yesterday's New York Times Magazine, Judith Warner speculated about whether Michelle Obama could make "field greens and strawberries as comforting, satisfying, and heartwarmingly American as apple pie?"

Actually, she can't.  And the reason lies in a intriguing column from the Wall Street Journal by Jonah Lehrer: It isn't as much about the taste as it is about the calories.

After citing the relevant experiments, Lehrer concludes:

[Scientific test results] suggest that we're programmed to enjoy calories regardless of their taste: We would still crave McGriddles and mashed potatoes even if these foods tasted like wheat germ and spinach. That's because a distinct part of gustatory pleasure has nothing to do with our tongues, with the savory and sweet sensations that we detect with our taste buds. Instead, we are delighted by the very calories we're supposed to resist.
Advertisement

For better or worse, there it is.  What's more, the Obamas might want to keep in mind part of the underlying psychology of some food disorders: Deciding what one will (or won't) put in one's mouth is one of the ways individuals seek to exercise some control over their lives.  Could it be possible that, the more the government tries to control us in every other area, the more Americans will seize autonomy where we can, namely, in our food choices?

As applied here, let's hope the theory isn't a good one -- otherwise, all of us will be grotesquely obese by the end of the first Obama term (or, God forbid, the second).

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement