Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
Tipsheet

A Whiff of Cronyism?

The efforts by the Obamas to woo the Olympics to Chicago is unprecedented for the level of presidential involvement.  No less an Obama fan than Eugene Robinson has wondered whether it bespeaks some level of immodesty -- and questions whether the Copenhagen trip is "overkill."
Advertisement


What's more, while 47% of Chicagoans are hoping the city wins the 2016 Olympics, fully 45% of them are not.  So in going to Copenhagen to lobby for the Olympics, it's not as though the Obamas are simply promoting the collective hopes of their once-fellow-Chicagoans.

So why the big push, anyhow?

The American Prowler lays out a serious offairly significant links between the Obamas and those who stand to benefit -- either monetarily or prestige-wise -- through Chicago winning the games.  Most significantly,

Obama senior adviser David Axelrod's firm, AKPD Message and Media, which employs his son, and which owes Axelrod money, is one of the contractors on the Chicago Olympics bid.

Another beneficiary would be the Pritzker family (Penny Pritzker was one of Obama's foremost big-money fundraisers).

Certainly none of this is illegal, and of course it's possible that the Obamas simply want to see their hometown through a haze of Olympic glory.  All that being said, consider what the outcry would be if, say, George W. Bush went to unprecedented lengths to win oil-drilling contracts for the US that would benefit Americans, but also help some of his best friends and biggest contributors in the oil industry -- if you dare.  "Corrupt" would be the kindest epithet applied by the left.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement