Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
Tipsheet

What "Unmeddling" Gets You

Even after taking a pass on the opportunity to speak out for freedom on behalf of Iranians in the street, President Obama is nonetheless being accused by Ahmadinejad of "interference."
Advertisement

Trying to avoid such an accusation has, of course, been the stated rationale of the President's studied refusal to offer more than half-hearted statements about the Iranian elections.  And yet -- gasp! -- the accusation has come anyway.

Perhaps it hasn't occurred to Obama yet, but the fact is that Ahmadinejad and his ilk aren't particularly bound by the facts in their interpretation of events, and their statements about them.  Nor (in contrast to the American press) do they hang on the President's every word and statement with something akin to a schoolgirl crush.

Has anyone heard of the old saying, "Might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb"?  If the mullahs are going to charge America with interference no matter what we do, why not do something to encourage those trying to replace a regime that is openly our enemy?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement