Biden Is Trying One Last Thing to Prevent Israel's All-Out Invasion of Rafah
With Threats of Pro-Hamas Chaos, Dems Consider Reusuing Past Ideas From 2020’s COVID...
Biden Tried to Keep These Calls With Israel Hidden. Here's What's Been Going...
Electoral College Mischief Not Unprecedented—You Don’t Have to Look That Far Back
Maternal Mortality and the Failure to Value Motherhood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 217: Celebrating Mother’s Day With the Mother of...
Four Honduran Illegals Caught Selling Enough Fentanyl to Kill 1.6 Million Americans
Biden Admin Is Reportedly Bribing Israel to Not Invade Rafah
A Problem to Fix: GOP House Candidate Alison Esposito Calls Out Antisemitism on...
The Way Clarence Thomas Describes DC Is Truly Terrifying
Democrat Believes Joe Biden’s Israel Threat Took Unnecessary 'Pressure off of Hamas'
Trump Flies Potential VP Pick to Massive 80,000 Person Rally
Is the Private Sector Ready For the Rising Threat of AI Cyber Warfare?
Why Are Jews and Christians Coming Together to Pray for Israel
Veterans Affairs OIG Calls for Full Investigation into $10.8 Million in Improper Incentive...
Tipsheet

Bordering on Journalistic Malpractice

If The New York Times is going to promote this story -- that Freddie Mac paid McCain advisor Rick Davis' firm through last month -- it would seem appropriate to include two important facts that the Times "conveniently" left out.
Advertisement


(1) If the lobbying payments were intended to help Freddie Mac cozy up to John McCain himself, they were a dismal failure.

Here is the page from the Congressional Record on May 25, 2006 where John McCain actually expresses concern about "the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac" and "the role they play in the housing market."  Read it for yourself.

(2) Rick Davis has not received any compensation from his firm since he left in 2006.

In light of these facts, it really borders on journalistic malpractice for the Times to run a big story headlined "McCain's Aide's Firm Was Paid by Freddie Mac."  The clear implication -- contrary to fact -- is that McCain and/or his aide somehow profited from the now-discredited organization.

As the McCain campaign has pointed out, we're still waiting for any Times scrutiny of Obama aide David Axelrod's clients, contacts and associations.  But don't hold your breath -- after all, it's the New York Times.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement