Bill Maher Offers a Simple Explanation for Why He Trashes the Left More...
Trump Continues to Increase His Lead Over Harris in Latest Electoral College Projection
Did You Miss This Damning Article About Kamala Harris on Axios?
Trump Spills What He'll Never Do Again If Elected Again
Why the SAVE Act terrifies Democrats
Josh Shapiro Warns Dems Not to 'Underestimate' Trump's Debate Skills
This Small Ohio Town Is Being Overrun By illegal Haitian Immigrants
U.S. Cuts Another Massive Check to Ukraine
Netanyahu Fears Hamas Will Smuggle Hostages Into Iran
Wait Until You Hear Joe Scarborough's Latest Lunacy Claim
Teacher Who Refused to Refer to Students by 'Preferred Pronouns' Jailed for the...
Trump Announces a Role for Dr. Ben Carson In His Administration
Longtime Democrat Alan Dershowitz Leaves His Party: 'Absolutely Disgusted'
Tim Walz Won't Like This Attraction That Drew Crowds at His Own State...
Antisemitism From the Right
Tipsheet

You Gotta Have Faith? Or Not?

In a move no doubt intended to signal his friendliness to people of faith (!), Barack Obama announced, according to this AP story:

plans to expand President Bush's program steering federal social service dollars to religious groups and -- in a move sure to cause controversy -- support some ability to hire and fire based on faith.

Advertisement
But wait a minute.  If this First Read account is accurate (and there's every reason to believe it is), Barack is flipping yet again

The original version of the AP story said Barack would "support their [i.e. the religious groups'] ability to hire and fire based on faith."  The Obama campaign said that characterization was inaccurate, so AP changed "their" to "some" ability . . .

But the campaign is still saying that the statement is inaccurate.

So which is it?  Does Barack support religious groups having the ability/some ability/any ability to hire and fire based on faith -- as the AP has reported -- or not?

Perhaps he simultaneously supports and opposes it, a la his position(s) on gay marriage and the DC gun ban?  Wow!  The options are endless!

It seems increasingly apparent that he's the candidate of "change" all right -- changing views, that is.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement