Are You Ready for Acting President Chuck Grassley?
America Is Back in 2025
Here's What a College Professor Said About the 2024 Race That Blew a...
Unreal: Jimmy Carter Outlived His NYT Obituary Writer
Border Czar Tom Homan Levels Jasmine Crockett After She Claims He 'Doesn't Know...
WATCH: Bodycam Footage Shows Correctional Officers Allegedly Beating Inmate to Death
Donald Trump Might Have Just Decided Mike Johnson's Fate As Speaker
Whistleblower Claims CIA Covered Up Foreign Involvement in Havana Syndrome Attacks in Reve...
Here We Go Again: More Chinese Espionage Targets America
Former Ambassador: It Will Take a War to Regain Control of the Panama...
Remember How the Biden Admin Sold Border Wall Materials? Well…
A ‘Trans’ Child Molester Was Sent to a Women’s Prison. You Won’t Believe...
Black Artist Says She Won't Write 'Soulful' Music for 'Non-Melanated' Singers
This CNN Exchange Illustrates Everything Wrong With the Media
JK Rowling: 'There Are No Trans Kids'
Tipsheet

Hmm: Amazon's Employee Cafeterias Look an Awful Lot Like Indoor Dining

AP Photo/Reed Saxon

The lockdowns have destroyed small businesses. But Amazon has never been better. And while many mom and pop restaurants are no longer allowed to offer indoor dining, it sure looks like Amazon is above the rules once again.

Advertisement

Pictures allegedly show employees dining indoors at an Amazon cafeteria. The diners appear to be practicing social distancing, with some seating areas closed off in an apparent effort to encourage the practice. But if Amazon can offer indoor dining, why can't restaurants? 

Eating in an Amazon cafeteria is like protesting at a left-wing rally. The elites give a pass to both.   

In March, as Democrat leaders raced to close down the economy, a video made the rounds showing Amazon employees packed inside a cafeteria in New York City. The company has since taken efforts to enforce social distancing but, once again, why aren't restaurants allowed to do the same? 

In a shouting match on CNBC, Rick Santelli sparred with The New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin over the unfairness of the lockdowns. Santelli responded to Sorkin's assertions that "science" has determined the ability of the virus to spread at big-box retailers is different than in places such as restaurants and churches. 

Advertisement

"It’s not science!" Santelli responded. "Five-hundred people in a Lowe’s aren’t any safer than 150 people in a restaurant that holds 600. I don't believe it! Sorry, don't believe it, and I live in an area where there's a lot of restaurants that have fought back and they don't have any problems."

Democrats don't follow the lockdowns themselves, carve out exceptions for their political allies, and ridicule anyone who questions the unfairness of it all as being "anti-science."

Democrats have mastered "science" all right. The science of deception and bullsh*t. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement