Huh? Dems Are Going to Try and Hurt Trump Over This?
Our Long Road to War With Iran
US Officials Warn That Iran Is Opening Up a New Front in the...
More Questions Have Surfaced About Eric Swalwell's Eligibility to Run for California Gover...
All It Took for Democrats to Cave on DHS Funding Was Four Terrorist...
Fox News Just Found More Medicare Fraud in California
The New York City Council Is About to Make Things Even More Expensive...
Woman Launches GoFundMe to Help Her DoorDash Driver Finally Retire
Gavin Newsom's Early Release Law Just Set Criminal With 300-Year Sentence Free
Secretary Hegseth Provided an Update on Operation Epic Fury. Here's What He Said.
Here's More Proof Mamdani's Wife Has an Antisemitism Problem
Is Buzzfeed About to Go Bust?
CENTCOM Confirms Four Heroes Killed in Refueling Aircraft Crash
They’re Losing. And They Know It.
California Scrambles to Bolster Drone Defenses After FBI Warns Iran May Target West...
Tipsheet

Hmm: Amazon's Employee Cafeterias Look an Awful Lot Like Indoor Dining

Hmm: Amazon's Employee Cafeterias Look an Awful Lot Like Indoor Dining
AP Photo/Reed Saxon

The lockdowns have destroyed small businesses. But Amazon has never been better. And while many mom and pop restaurants are no longer allowed to offer indoor dining, it sure looks like Amazon is above the rules once again.

Advertisement

Pictures allegedly show employees dining indoors at an Amazon cafeteria. The diners appear to be practicing social distancing, with some seating areas closed off in an apparent effort to encourage the practice. But if Amazon can offer indoor dining, why can't restaurants? 

Eating in an Amazon cafeteria is like protesting at a left-wing rally. The elites give a pass to both.   

In March, as Democrat leaders raced to close down the economy, a video made the rounds showing Amazon employees packed inside a cafeteria in New York City. The company has since taken efforts to enforce social distancing but, once again, why aren't restaurants allowed to do the same? 

In a shouting match on CNBC, Rick Santelli sparred with The New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin over the unfairness of the lockdowns. Santelli responded to Sorkin's assertions that "science" has determined the ability of the virus to spread at big-box retailers is different than in places such as restaurants and churches. 

Advertisement

"It’s not science!" Santelli responded. "Five-hundred people in a Lowe’s aren’t any safer than 150 people in a restaurant that holds 600. I don't believe it! Sorry, don't believe it, and I live in an area where there's a lot of restaurants that have fought back and they don't have any problems."

Democrats don't follow the lockdowns themselves, carve out exceptions for their political allies, and ridicule anyone who questions the unfairness of it all as being "anti-science."

Democrats have mastered "science" all right. The science of deception and bullsh*t. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement