Bill Maher Reveals Why He's Harder on Dems Today...and It Was Something
Bang Up Job, Gavin! Newsom's Press Office Launches Lame Attack on Reflecting Pool...
Today's DEI Law School Students Are the Judges Democrats Will Pack the Courts...
When Propaganda Becomes Psychological Abuse
Nick Kristallnacht
Brothers From Ghana Among Three Charged in Online Romance Scam Targeting Seniors
10 Shootings Rock South Austin; 2 Suspects in Custody, 1 Still at Large
The White House Issues a Powerful Message of Prayer in Celebration of Rededication...
All of the Worst People Are Coming Out to Support Thomas Massie
Trump Warns Iran: 'Get Moving' or 'There Won't Be Anything Left'
America at 250: Renewing the Faith That Made Us Free
Two Navy Aircraft Suffer Mid-Air Collision at Idaho Air Show
Ken Paxton Scores Historic Win Against the Transgender Movement
Ukraine Launches Drone Attack on Moscow Targeting Oil Infrastructure
Cuba Acquires Over 300 Attack Drones As Tensions With US Rise
Tipsheet

Hmm: Amazon's Employee Cafeterias Look an Awful Lot Like Indoor Dining

Hmm: Amazon's Employee Cafeterias Look an Awful Lot Like Indoor Dining
AP Photo/Reed Saxon

The lockdowns have destroyed small businesses. But Amazon has never been better. And while many mom and pop restaurants are no longer allowed to offer indoor dining, it sure looks like Amazon is above the rules once again.

Advertisement

Pictures allegedly show employees dining indoors at an Amazon cafeteria. The diners appear to be practicing social distancing, with some seating areas closed off in an apparent effort to encourage the practice. But if Amazon can offer indoor dining, why can't restaurants? 

Eating in an Amazon cafeteria is like protesting at a left-wing rally. The elites give a pass to both.   

In March, as Democrat leaders raced to close down the economy, a video made the rounds showing Amazon employees packed inside a cafeteria in New York City. The company has since taken efforts to enforce social distancing but, once again, why aren't restaurants allowed to do the same? 

In a shouting match on CNBC, Rick Santelli sparred with The New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin over the unfairness of the lockdowns. Santelli responded to Sorkin's assertions that "science" has determined the ability of the virus to spread at big-box retailers is different than in places such as restaurants and churches. 

Advertisement

"It’s not science!" Santelli responded. "Five-hundred people in a Lowe’s aren’t any safer than 150 people in a restaurant that holds 600. I don't believe it! Sorry, don't believe it, and I live in an area where there's a lot of restaurants that have fought back and they don't have any problems."

Democrats don't follow the lockdowns themselves, carve out exceptions for their political allies, and ridicule anyone who questions the unfairness of it all as being "anti-science."

Democrats have mastered "science" all right. The science of deception and bullsh*t. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement