Hollywood Woke Moralizing Is the Pits
You Don't Own Me
Daily Beast Has a Desperately Deceptive Epstein Hit, and the BBC Appeases Dog-Hating...
The Abuse of Liberty Is As Dangerous As the Abuse of Power
Elitist 'Public' Broadcasting Defines 'Viewpoint Discrimination'
New York's Governor Seems Indifferent to the Health Consequences of a Steep Tax...
Why the Shield of the Americas Matters Now: Noem’s Latin American Visit Signals...
A Breakthrough Within Reach: Why Trump/Kennedy Should Lead on Psychedelic Medicine
Conversion Therapy Wins Big in SCOTUS
Indiana: The Crossroads of America — and the ‘Reproductive Justice’ Debate
A Republic, If Our Media Let Us Keep It
The Context Behind the Cardinal Being Denied Entry to One of Christianity’s Holy...
Celebrating 250 Years of Women’s Influence in America
Infinite Immigration Is the Law of the Land According to This Radical Judge
Trump Just Issued His Most Consequential Executive Order Yet
Tipsheet

Newsom Signs Bill Removing Automatic Penalty for 'Consensual' Sex Acts Involving Minors

Newsom Signs Bill Removing Automatic Penalty for 'Consensual' Sex Acts Involving Minors
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

On Friday, Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law, passed by the Democrat-controlled state senate and Democrat-controlled state assembly, that reduces penalties for certain adults who engage in sex acts with children as young as 14 years of age. The law makes it more likely that parents won't know when a sex offender has access to their children. 

Advertisement

SB-145 removes the automatic requirement for a person to register as a sex offender when "convicted of nonforcible sodomy with a minor, oral copulation with a minor, or sexual penetration with a minor," so long as the child is at least 14 years of age and the adult is not older than the child by more than 10 years when the sex crime took place, according to Senate Floor Analysis. With the automatic requirement to register as a sex offender removed, only a judge can impose the requirement as part of the sentencing. Judges routinely spark outrage for incredibly lenient sentences involving sex crimes against children.

The bill is being touted as pro-LGBT legislation because it ends what supporters of the legislation are calling long-standing discrimination against the LGBT community. Supporters of the bill say the automatic requirement was discriminatory against gay people because a 24-year-old adult who was convicted of "consensual" oral and anal sex acts with a 15-year-old minor was previously required to register as a sex offender. But if the same-aged adult and minor had engaged in penile-vaginal sex, the offending adult would not be automatically required to register. 

Advertisement

But if protecting children from predators is somehow discriminatory against gay people, what does that say about the LGBT community? 

Rather than impose the automatic requirement on adults who have penile-vaginal sex with minors, the lawmaker who introduced the bill -- state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco -- chose to reduce the penalty on sex offenders instead. The automatic requirement was a safety measure to protect children by mandating sex offenders register on the list, regardless of whatever judge may be overseeing the case. 

SB-145 makes it more likely that parents won't know when a sex offender is living next door. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement