We Know How the Old Dominion University Terrorist Got a Gun
Yes, This NYT Headline Is Real...and They Appear to Have a Muslim Terrorist...
We Got Some More Manpower Heading to the Middle East
CNN's Kaitlin Collins Set Up Scott Jennings Perfectly to Torch the Biden Administration
My Word, Ms. Spanberger, What Fresh Hell Is This Tweet?
Victory for President Trump’s DOGE – ACLJ Amicus Brief Affirmed
Did We Avoid Another Terrorist Attack This Week? This Arrest in Texas Makes...
Globalize the Intifada? Authorities in the Netherlands Are Investigating Fire at Synagogue
What Can We Do About Islam in America?
More Questions Have Surfaced About Eric Swalwell's Eligibility to Run for California Gover...
Does Retaliation Against the United States Mean We Shouldn't Wage War Against Our...
Pete Hegseth Blasts Reports That the United States Did Not Plan on Iran...
All Six American Crewman Aboard Refueling Aircraft That Crashed in Iraq Confirmed Dead
Ex-Top Gun Pilot Says The Threat of Iranian Sleeper Cells 'Is Not a...
Even Obama's Former DHS Secretary Is Calling on Democrats to Fund DHS
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Cases Regarding President Trump's Financial Records

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Cases Regarding President Trump's Financial Records
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear three cases that would address whether or not congressional or criminal subpoenas can be issued for President Donald Trump's financial records. President Trump and his legal team have said his records fall under executive privilege. 

Advertisement

From the Wall Street Journal:

The high court is the president’s last hope to stop House investigators and New York state prosecutors from probing his financial dealings dating back nearly a decade, and potentially longer. Lower courts upheld the subpoenas, which were served not on Mr. Trump himself but an accounting firm and two banks that hold the records.

Had the court refused to hear the cases, the accounting firm and two banks would have had to turn over Mr. Trump’s financial records promptly.

“We are pleased that the Supreme Court granted review of the president’s three pending cases,” said Jay Sekulow, an attorney for Mr. Trump. “These cases raise significant constitutional issues. We look forward to presenting our written and oral arguments.”

...

Should the high court uphold the subpoenas, Mr. Trump faces the prospect that records involving his tax strategies and business dealings could be handed over to prosecutors or lawmakers. Mr. Trump reneged on a pledge to release his tax returns when he ran in 2016, making him the first major-party presidential candidate in recent history to do that.

The cases will test the Supreme Court’s ability to navigate the boundaries of power between, in the House case, the federal government’s legislative and executive branches and, in the New York case, between federal prerogatives and the states’ power to enforce their criminal laws.

Advertisement

The fact that the Supreme Court decided to take the case is unusual. The Court generally takes up cases where lower courts come to different conclusions. In these cases, the lower courts ruled against Trump. According to the Daily Caller, the Court generally takes up "pressing questions of executive immunity at the request of the incumbent president."

Oral arguments are scheduled for March with a decision anticipated for June.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement