Oh, So That’s How Fauci's Damning Emails Were Buried
Another Big Lie About Israel Just Spread Like Wildfire
NRA Scores Big Win at the Supreme Court
EXCLUSIVE OFFER: 60% Off VIP Membership. Today Only!
Michigan Man With a Suspended License Joins a Court Zoom Call *While* Driving
To Fund Immigrant Services, Denver Slashed Its Police Department and Will Answer 911...
Here's What McDonald's President Had to Say to US Consumers in 'Rare' Open...
Here's What Residents in This Country Think of Pro-Hamas Student Demonstrations
Here's Why This Senate Republican Is Calling for a $55 Billion Defense Investment
'Rather Astonishing': Ted Cruz Calls out Biden's 'Witness Tampering' Ahead of Hunter's Tri...
Nurses in the UK Have Filed a Lawsuit Alleging Sexual Harassment From a...
This Super Liberal City Was Actually Flying Alito's 'Controversial' Flag Until Recently
GOP Governor Approves Legislation Penalizing Adults Who Help Children Get Abortions and Tr...
Timing of Democrats Calling for Minnesota State Senator to Resign Is Suspicious
Democrat Mayor Says Her City's Gang Registry Should Be Abolished
Tipsheet

Jury Rules Pro-Life Group Must Pay Planned Parenthood Nearly $1 Million in Damages

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

A federal jury in San Francisco on Friday ruled that the pro-life group Center for Medical Progress (CMP), led by David Daleiden, must pay Planned Parenthood $870,000 in punitive damages. According to the jury, CMP "caused substantial harm to Planned Parenthood by infiltrating abortion industry conferences to secretly tape abortion doctors and staff," Courthouse News reported.

Advertisement

Between 2013 and 2015, Daleiden and his co-defendant, Sandra Merritt, attended abortion industry conferences posing as human tissue procurers. During those conferences, Daleiden and Merritt secretly recorded conversations as part of an investigation into the abortion giant.

According to Daleiden’s attorneys, CMP was investigating "violent felonies." Daleiden and Merritt believed babies were being born alive at Planned Parenthood clinics and that the organization was illegally selling fetal tissue for medical research.

In court, Planned Parenthood argued the videos were selectively edited to make it look as though employees were talking about making money off fetal tissue donations. Planned Parenthood currently operates fetal tissue programs at six clinics in California and Washington.

"David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress intentionally waged a multi-year illegal effort to manufacture a malicious campaign against Planned Parenthood,” Alexis McGill Johnson, the acting president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, told TheHill. “The jury recognized today that those behind the campaign broke the law in order to advance their goals of banning safe, legal abortion in this country, and to prevent Planned Parenthood from serving the patients who depend on us.”

Advertisement

The judge overseeing the six-week long trial said the jury couldn't consider any information uncovered as a result of the video investigation.

"At least three congressional committees and law enforcement officials in 13 states launched investigations into Planned Parenthood after Daleiden’s group released the footage in 2015. None of the probes confirmed any wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood," Fox News reported.

CMP and Daleiden were upset with the decision, saying justice was not served.

"Justice was not done today in San Francisco. While top Planned Parenthood witnesses spent six weeks testifying under oath that the undercover videos are true and Planned Parenthood sold fetal organs on a quid pro quo basis, a biased judge with close Planned Parenthood ties spent six weeks trying to influence the jury with pre-determined rulings and suppressed the video evidence, all in order to rubber-stamp Planned Parenthood’s lawsuit attack on the First Amendment," Daleiden said in a statement. "This is a dangerous precedent for citizen journalism and First Amendment civil rights across the country, sending a message that speaking truth and facts to criticize the powerful is no longer protected by our institutions."

Advertisement

Daleiden’s lawyer, Peter Breen, said he plans to challenge the ruling on First Amendment grounds. According to Breen, the compensatory damages are a result of the videos being published online.

“We believe the compensatory damages should go to zero on appeal,” he said, adding that he found it ludicrous the jury found the defendants had participated in a racketeering conspiracy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement