So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
Why the Hell Should We Care If Democrats Don’t?
Israel Misunderstood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 303: The Best of St. Paul
Greenland and the Return of Great-Power Politics
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Just Ruled In Mysterious Foreign Company's Challenge to the Mueller Subpoena

A foreign company has been trying to fight a grand jury subpoena linked to the Mueller investigation. The company was told to comply with the subpoena or face a $5,000 a week contempt charge. Last month, the Supreme Court put a halt to the orders. The Supreme Court has finally ruled in the case and said the foreign company must comply with the Muller subpoena, effectively upholding a lower court's decision.

Advertisement

The ruling offered no explanation and no dissent from any of the justices. This was the text of the ruling:

The application for stay, presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court, is denied. The administrative stay previously entered by The Chief Justice is vacated.

Chief Justice John Roberts last week had put the pending compliance order on temporary hold, while he and his eight colleagues considered the corporation's stay request, Fox News reported. 

The company has cited the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act for refusing to comply. Under the Act, the company would be violating the laws of their home country.

Many believe this to be the first time any issue relating the Mueller probe has come before the high court.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement