Oh, We Know What the Brown University Shooter Reportedly Said Before Opening Fire
To the Shock of No One, Australian PM Says Bondi Terrorists Motivated by...
If You Were Hoping That Trump Would Tone Down His Remarks on Rob...
Nice Try, Dems, But Your Little Stunt Against Kristi Noem Last Week Imploded...
When One Seeks Updates on the Brown University Shooting, It Shouldn't Devolve Like...
GOP Lawmakers Slam Critics of Airstrikes Against Venezuelan Boats
Speaker Mike Johnson Just Ended the Democrats' Lies About Taxpayer-Funded Healthcare for I...
Wisconsin's Supreme Court Just Handed Catholic Charities a Major Win (and Dealt a...
The November Jobs Numbers Are Here, and It's Good News for American Workers
The Left Pivots Away From 'Islamophobia' With New Euphemism for People Who Notice...
USA Today Journalist Doubles Down on 'Appeal to Heaven' Ignorance
After Failing to Engage Bondi Beach Terrorists, Guess Who the Australian Police Did...
This Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like: Orthodox Jews Attacked on NYC...
The U.S. Just Conducted Another Lethal Kinetic Strike on Narco Boats
The Quiet Crisis Consuming Young Men — and the People Getting Rich Off...
Tipsheet

Another Cluster of Pro-Gun Groups Challenge ATF's 'Illegal And Unconstitutional' Bump Stock Ban

Ever since the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced the official bump stock ban on Dec. 18th, numerous lawsuits have been filed. Gun Owners of America vowed to file a lawsuit as well and that time has officially come. 

Advertisement

Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, Virginia Citizens Defense League and three citizens on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker over the bump stock ban.

According to the lawsuit, the ATF's decision to change the bump stock's definition to that of a machine gun is a political in nature.

"ATF's re-classification of bump stocks as machineguns is a political decision designed to circumvent the legislative process, not a legal one based on any technical evaluation," the lawsuit states. "It ignores the plain text of the statute, and all prior ATF determinations and opinions. The classification of bump stocks as machineguns is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, obfuscates the way bump stocks operate, and reaches and irrational decision, unsupportable in either law or fact."

GOA believes the bump stock ban can create a slippery slope for other future gun control measures. 

“These dangerous regulations can go much farther than just bump stocks. The goal of the anti-gun left is, ultimately, not just banning bump stocks, but, rather, putting ‘points on the board’ toward its goal of banning civilian ownership of all firearms," said Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America. “These dangerous regulations can go much farther than just bump stocks. The goal of the anti-gun left is, ultimately, not just banning bump stocks, but, rather, putting ‘points on the board’ toward its goal of banning civilian ownership of all firearms.”

Advertisement

Related:

ATF

The plaintiffs are seeing a preliminary injunction to keep the ATF from enforcing the bump stock ban. Eventually, they would like a declaratory judgement that states a bump stock is not considered a machine gun. 

The lawsuit was filed in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers the Western District of Michigan and is known to be pro-gun. 

Here's the full lawsuit:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos