This Podcast Interview Only Reminds Us How Lucky We Are That Trump Beat...
What If Dems Are Shut Out of the CA Gov Race? Newsom Says...
Appeals Court Blocks Trump Settlement to E. Jean Carroll...for Now
Maryland Might Revive Gerrymander Push, but There Are a Couple Problems
Variety Gets Wrecked for Attacking Critics of the 'Diverse' Cast of Nolan's Odyssey
Democrats Khanna and Tlaib Sponsor Resolution That Backs Global Anti-Israel 'Nakba 78' Pro...
America Has a Serious Literacy Problem on Its Hands
President Trump Bids Farewell to China
The NYPD Is Investigating Another Antisemitic Incident at NYU
'See You in Court:' DOJ Sues Virginia Over Assault Weapons Ban
Leftists Fall for Mamdani's NYC Budget Deficit Lies
AOC: New Leader of the Democrat Party?
Can-Do Nation
The Biden Administration Is to Blame for Spirit’s Demise
America Just Told the UN to Pound Sand on Replacement Migration
Tipsheet

Another Cluster of Pro-Gun Groups Challenge ATF's 'Illegal And Unconstitutional' Bump Stock Ban

Another Cluster of Pro-Gun Groups Challenge ATF's 'Illegal And Unconstitutional' Bump Stock Ban

Ever since the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced the official bump stock ban on Dec. 18th, numerous lawsuits have been filed. Gun Owners of America vowed to file a lawsuit as well and that time has officially come. 

Advertisement

Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, Virginia Citizens Defense League and three citizens on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker over the bump stock ban.

According to the lawsuit, the ATF's decision to change the bump stock's definition to that of a machine gun is a political in nature.

"ATF's re-classification of bump stocks as machineguns is a political decision designed to circumvent the legislative process, not a legal one based on any technical evaluation," the lawsuit states. "It ignores the plain text of the statute, and all prior ATF determinations and opinions. The classification of bump stocks as machineguns is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, obfuscates the way bump stocks operate, and reaches and irrational decision, unsupportable in either law or fact."

GOA believes the bump stock ban can create a slippery slope for other future gun control measures. 

“These dangerous regulations can go much farther than just bump stocks. The goal of the anti-gun left is, ultimately, not just banning bump stocks, but, rather, putting ‘points on the board’ toward its goal of banning civilian ownership of all firearms," said Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America. “These dangerous regulations can go much farther than just bump stocks. The goal of the anti-gun left is, ultimately, not just banning bump stocks, but, rather, putting ‘points on the board’ toward its goal of banning civilian ownership of all firearms.”

Advertisement

Related:

ATF

The plaintiffs are seeing a preliminary injunction to keep the ATF from enforcing the bump stock ban. Eventually, they would like a declaratory judgement that states a bump stock is not considered a machine gun. 

The lawsuit was filed in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers the Western District of Michigan and is known to be pro-gun. 

Here's the full lawsuit:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement