Calm Down About JD Vance
Caracas in Ruins: Up to 100,000 Feared Dead As Massive Earthquakes Rock Venezuela
Sorry, Mr. President, but the SAVE Act Isn’t Happening This Year
The Mind and Brilliance of Alexis de Tocqueville, Part Two
The Anti-Socialists Strike Back
A Time of Choosing
Trump: The Greater Risk Was Waiting
From London's Tennis Courts to California, Aggressive Taxes Always Disappoint
World Cup Visitors Get It; the Pope and Socialists Don't
The Socialists Are Coming for Your Grandparents
Despite the 54th Anniversary of Title IX, Men Are Still Competing in Women’s...
Fog of War: When Political Rhetoric Meets Strategic Reality
Trump Declares 'America Is Back' at America250 Kickoff
Four Charged in Scheme to Profit Off NYC Migrant Housing Crisis
Illegal Alien Charged With Stealing American's Identity, Bilking $800K From Taxpayers
Tipsheet

Another Cluster of Pro-Gun Groups Challenge ATF's 'Illegal And Unconstitutional' Bump Stock Ban

Another Cluster of Pro-Gun Groups Challenge ATF's 'Illegal And Unconstitutional' Bump Stock Ban

Ever since the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced the official bump stock ban on Dec. 18th, numerous lawsuits have been filed. Gun Owners of America vowed to file a lawsuit as well and that time has officially come. 

Advertisement

Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, Virginia Citizens Defense League and three citizens on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker over the bump stock ban.

According to the lawsuit, the ATF's decision to change the bump stock's definition to that of a machine gun is a political in nature.

"ATF's re-classification of bump stocks as machineguns is a political decision designed to circumvent the legislative process, not a legal one based on any technical evaluation," the lawsuit states. "It ignores the plain text of the statute, and all prior ATF determinations and opinions. The classification of bump stocks as machineguns is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, obfuscates the way bump stocks operate, and reaches and irrational decision, unsupportable in either law or fact."

GOA believes the bump stock ban can create a slippery slope for other future gun control measures. 

“These dangerous regulations can go much farther than just bump stocks. The goal of the anti-gun left is, ultimately, not just banning bump stocks, but, rather, putting ‘points on the board’ toward its goal of banning civilian ownership of all firearms," said Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America. “These dangerous regulations can go much farther than just bump stocks. The goal of the anti-gun left is, ultimately, not just banning bump stocks, but, rather, putting ‘points on the board’ toward its goal of banning civilian ownership of all firearms.”

Advertisement

Related:

ATF

The plaintiffs are seeing a preliminary injunction to keep the ATF from enforcing the bump stock ban. Eventually, they would like a declaratory judgement that states a bump stock is not considered a machine gun. 

The lawsuit was filed in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers the Western District of Michigan and is known to be pro-gun. 

Here's the full lawsuit:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement