So, That's How The New York Times Framed the ICE Ambush in Minneapolis...
The Departure of Top DOJ Attorneys Allegedly Over the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis...
Remember When CNN Did Ride-Alongs With ICE? Here's the (D)ifference.
Why This Exchange Between Josh Hawley and a Lib Doctor on Abortion Pills...
Why the FBI Searched a Washington Post Reporter's Home Yesterday
US Military Intervention in Iran Could Be Imminent
Jacob Frey Just Said He Never Incited Violence Against ICE. Here Are Times...
Voters Rejected the ‘Values’ Minneapolis Democrats Hold Dear
Trump Just Gave Minnesota an Ultimatum
St. Paul Teachers Union Orders Members to ‘Pick a Side’ and Walk Out...
Cea Weaver Identifies the 'Huge Problem' Obstructing Her Communist Housing Agenda, and Gue...
Here’s How Jasmine Crockett Handled Tough Questions About Her Double Standard
Oh, Wittle Zohran Got So Mad Did He
White House Tells Walz to 'Resign in Disgrace' After Anti-ICE Meltdown
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 2
Tipsheet

Eric Holder's Democratic PAC Is Suing Wisconsin Over a Bill Gov. Scott Walker Just Signed Into Law

One of the last bills outgoing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) signed into law – which implemented voter identification restrictions – is now being challenged by two liberal groups. One Wisconsin Institute and Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund are working closely with former Attorney General Eric Holder's group, the National Democratic Redistricting Foundation. The NDRF is providing the two groups with legal assistance, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported. 

Advertisement

The two groups want to change the state's ID requirements in order to vote. They want to see temporary voting credentials be valid for 180 days, opposed to the law's 60 days. The liberal groups also want to allow students to use their student ID to vote, even if it's expired. 

The other point of contention the liberal groups have is the length of time designated for early voting. The bill signed into law limits early voting to the 13 days prior to the election. In the past, there was no set timeframe. Local government was able to determine how long they allowed early voting to take place. And, in Democratic strongholds like Milwaukee and Madison, people had six weeks to vote prior to Election Day. 

“The Wisconsin Republican attempts to rig the rules on voting were unconstitutional in 2016 and they’re unconstitutional today,” One Wisconsin Institute's executive director, Scot Ross, said in a statement. “We are going back to federal court to ask the judge to enforce his previous ruling and actions to force the GOP to respect our right to vote.”

“In the original case Judge Peterson found that the early voting restrictions imposed by Scott Walker and conservatives in the Legislature constituted deliberate racial discrimination and violated the democratic rights of all Wisconsin voters,” Robert Kraig, Executive Director of Citizen Action of Wisconsin, said in a statement. “It is shocking that without any legal rational, the Legislature and Governor Walker have has decided to ignore the ruling of a federal judge by again seeking to limit early voting. We are optimistic that this latest attempt to disenfranchise Wisconsin voters will blocked in time for the spring 2019 elections.”

Advertisement

Related:

VOTING RIGHTS

Holder took to Twitter to criticize Walker's decision to sign the bills into law:

The bill that was signed into law was part of Gov. Walker's attempt at limiting the amount of power incoming-Gov. Tony Evers (D) will have once he takes office. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos