An Update on Dennis Prager
Bill Gates Wants to Do What to Our Food Supply?
Trump's FCC Nominee Vows to Bulldoze Censorship
We Now Know How Trump Plans to Implement His Deportation Force
Preliminary Results of Des Moines Register Investigation Into Selzer Poll
PA Supreme Court to Dems: The Steal Ends Now
Amazing Surprises Keep Coming
Anti-Gun Freakout Over Suppressor Sales Much Ado About Nothing
MSNBC Hosts Met With Trump for First Time in 7 Years. They Explained...
Here's Why a Slew of College Athletes Filed a Title IX Lawsuit
Wow: Iowa's 'Gold Standard' Pollster Is Quitting Election Polling After Badly Botching Fin...
Here's Who AOC Is Now Blaming for Election Losses
A Cruise Line Will Offer Americans a Four-Year Escape From Trump's Presidency
Medical Examiner Makes Stunning Admission During Daniel Penny Trial
Trial Begins in Human Smuggling Case After an Indian Family Froze to Death...
Tipsheet

Gun Rights Groups Take Aim at SoCal Sheriff For 'Discriminatory and Unconstitutional' CCW Policies

After the Dec. 2015 shooting at Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, Calif., residents in the area began to apply for concealed carry weapons permits en masse. San Bernardino County's applications increased nine-fold. Neighboring Riverside County also saw a drastic increase in their CCW applications. 

Advertisement

Since that tragedy almost three years ago, Riverside County has had a very steady flow of applications coming in. So much so that Sheriff Stan Sniff hired more employees to handle the CCW backlog, which sat at a two-year await, as of this past April. 

A resident and five pro-gun groups have filed a lawsuit against Riverside County and Sheriff Sniff for his concealed carry license policy and practices that, the plaintiffs allege, are unconstitutional.

Riverside County resident Arie van Nieuwenhuyzen purchased a handgun with the intent of applying for a CCW. When he asked the Sheriff's department how he would go about apply, he was told he was ineligible for a permit because he's a U.S. resident, not a U.S. citizen.

Van Nieuwenhuyzen has lived in Riverside since 1983 as a legal U.S. resident. According to the lawsuit, van Nieuwenhuyzen has been a successful business owner and member of the community. He is an active member of his church and teaches Sunday School. He "has obeyed all laws and customs of his adopted country and state."

“Courts across the country have long held that legal United States residents are entitled to the same constitutional protections as everyone else,” lead attorney George M. Lee said in a statement. “Sheriff Sniff’s discriminatory and unconstitutional policies and practices are denying people access to the right to keep and bear arms and violating the Fourteenth Amendment’s command that all people shall enjoy equal protection of our laws.”

Advertisement

Lee said Sheriff Sniff is impeding on van Nieuwenhuyzen's Second Amendment rights.

“Mr. van Nieuwenhuyzen has a fundamental human right to carry his gun outside his home for self-defense, but Sheriff Sniff’s policies and practices prevent him from doing so. Those customs are our first target in this case, and we look forward to forcing Sheriff Sniff to respect and follow the United States Constitution,” Lee said.

The Calguns Foundation (CGF), Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF), and Madison Society Foundation (MSF) have signed onto the lawsuit as institutional plaintiffs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement