Iran's New Leader Breaks Silence, Issues Threats Against US and Arab Neighbors
Gavin Newsom Is Crushing the Field in This 2028 Preview
Corrupt Illinois Mayor Thinks She Can Win in Georgia As a Republican
The Old Dominion University Shooter Has Been ID'd and It Looks Like Islamic...
After Threatening ICE Agents, a Wisconsin Man Enters the FO Stage
Democrats Are Attacking Hegseth's Supposed Steak Budget. They'll Hate This Next Number.
UPDATE: Suspected MI Synagogue Shooter Engaged by Security, Reportedly Dead
Check Out What London Is Now Recommending City Buses Carry for Some Unspoken...
Gunman Dead After Opening Fire at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia
Victor Davis Hanson Reveals Three Ways Operation Epic Fury Ends, And Why They...
Fetterman Goes Off on Fellow Democrats: Why Can’t They Just Admit Operation Epic...
The White House Pushes Back on Reports That Iran Could Be Targeting the...
President Trump Unloads on Thomas Massie at Kentucky Rally: ‘We Gotta Get Rid...
Tim Burchett Blasts ‘Snobs’ Attacking Trump DHS Nominee Markwayne Mullin Over Lack of...
Trans Mania Sweeps New Mexico Schools – Even Elementaries Will ‘Affirm’ Gender Choices
Tipsheet

Massachusetts Lawmakers Pass ‘NASTY Women Act’ to Protect Abortion

Massachusetts Lawmakers Pass ‘NASTY Women Act’ to Protect Abortion

In response to fears of Roe v. Wade being overturned, Massachusetts state lawmakers have passed a 'NASTY Women Act’ that will repeal a 173-year-old law banning abortion in the state.

Advertisement

“I think people are beginning to realize these are strange times we live in,” said Massachusetts State Senate President Harriette Chandler.

“Nothing is impossible, and we’ve got to have a ‘plan B.’ If these laws are enforced, what do we do? We’re not willing to sit back and say, ‘Well, it’s not going to happen here.’ The word for that is denial.”

Although abortion is legal in the United States, Chandler introduced the NASTY Women Act (Negating Archaic Statutes Targeting Young Women bill) in January in order to prevent the state from reinforcing the law in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned.

Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker (R-MA) said he plans to sign the bill into law.

“We will sign that,” he told reporters Monday.

“There are many folks in the women’s health community that were particularly concerned about this. The lieutenant governor and I and other folks on our team discussed it, and we do plan to sign it.”

In light of President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States, critics are concerned that Roe v. Wade is coming to an end.

“The changing dynamics of the Supreme Court is a real and legitimate concern,” said Claire Cronin, House chair of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary in Massachusetts.

“We have both a president and a vice president who have expressed an intent to overturn Roe v. Wade, and we take them at their word.”

However, some evangelical leaders say that simply overturning Roe v. Wade at the Supreme Court level would not end abortion entirely.

Advertisement

“What people don’t understand is that if you overturn Roe v. Wade, all that does is give the states the right to decide whether abortion is legal or illegal,” said Rev. Jerry Falwell Jr.

“My guess is that there’d probably be less than 20 states that would make abortion illegal if given that right. In the 70s, I don’t know how many states had abortion illegal before Roe v. Wade, but it won’t be near as many this time.”

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) wrote Tuesday that Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s “public record demonstrates hostility towards contraception and abortion,” and that if he is confirmed to the SCOTUS, “he will work to overturn Roe.”

“President Trump’s hostility to women is no secret, and his selection of Judge Kavanaugh to join the Court is just the most recent in his long line of attacks on reproductive freedom. But this attack is particularly dangerous because as a Supreme Court Justice, Judge Kavanaugh would be able to affect policy for a lot longer than a four-year Presidential term.”

“America can’t go back to an era of back-alley abortions and can’t move into a future where reproductive rights are restricted,” the senator warned.

“It’s time for Americans to raise their voices, flood the halls of the Senate, work the phone lines, and tell the President and the Senate: no to Judge Kavanaugh.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos