Watch Clarence Thomas Handle This Liberal Reporter Perfectly During a Visit on the...
Virginia's Anti-Gun Push Is Slowly Getting Bogged Down
Has the ‘Revolution’ Already Passed AOC By?
More Reflections on the Gravity of the Reflecting Pool; and Nicolle Wallace Is...
Appalachian Awakening: Rewriting American Music Culture
Democrats Now and Then
Battle Royale
Collateral Damage Was the Plan
Iran's Theocracy Has Given Way to an IRGC Military Dictatorship
The Sentence That Forever Changed History
The Electric Grid Is Actually America’s Most Important Homeland Security System
How a Hungarian Janitor Gave My Family Many Memorable Fourth of Julys
Does Germany's World Cup Loss Mean the U.S. Could Actually Win It All?
The Alaskan Supreme Court Just Gave Democrats a Lifeline With This Insane Ruling
JoAnna Mendoza's Tax Hike Record Is Catching Up to Her
Tipsheet

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

We're getting tired of activist judges undermining the Trump administration and its work to control wasteful spending, end fraud, and right America's fiscal ship. Countless judges have ruled against the Trump administration not because the administration is wrong, but because they don't like the President and his policy choices, and another judge did that with a ruling against Elon Musk's DOGE.

Advertisement

Here's more:

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “blatantly used” race, gender and other protected characteristics to execute the largest mass termination of federal grants in the history of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal judge ruled on Thursday. 

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared the terminations unlawful, concluded that the DOGE staffers lacked the authority to make those decisions, and blocked the Trump administration from carrying out the grant terminations. 

“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote.

 So, awarding grants on the basis of certain characteristics is good. But ending discriminatory grants is bad. Got it.

This is Calvinball, and the rules will keep changing to benefit the Left.

Advertisement

Bingo.

Because it is.

Same vibes. Ignore it.

Probably. They know this, too, but they're hoping to run out the clock until the midterms or 2028 so Democrats can regain power.

Which is why judges are defending it.

Nailed it.

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement