The One Dem No One Is Going to Miss If He Loses Next...
This GOP Rep Had a Simple Question for the American Bar Association. It...
That Thing Jack Smith Said Could Happen After His Anti-Trump Investigations Failed Actuall...
After the Arizona Primaries, Total Fury Erupts Over Establishment Dems' Election Meddling
Hunter Biden Absolutely Roasted This Journalist in Expletive-Laden Tirade
This Congressional Candidate Just Told the LGBTQ Community They're Not Her Priority. Guess...
An Officer-Involved Shooting in Madison Revealed the Dangerous Anti-Cop Agenda of WI Democ...
Is ActBlue Helping Fund Abdul El-Sayed's Campaign With Fake Donors?
The WI Democratic Primary Just Went Completely Off the Rails
The Left Will Never Understand 'Shall Not Be Infringed'
Mike Waltz Just Made a Fool of This WI Congressman and His Defense...
A Bunch of Democrats Joined a Livestream Where the DSA Attacked America and...
Mamdani Was Asked About Arresting Hamas War Criminals, and His Answer Was Revealing
James Talarico Continues Pandering to Voters, This Time by Supporting Reparations
Houthis Attacked Oil Tankers – That's Not Flying With Trump
Tipsheet

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

We're getting tired of activist judges undermining the Trump administration and its work to control wasteful spending, end fraud, and right America's fiscal ship. Countless judges have ruled against the Trump administration not because the administration is wrong, but because they don't like the President and his policy choices, and another judge did that with a ruling against Elon Musk's DOGE.

Advertisement

Here's more:

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “blatantly used” race, gender and other protected characteristics to execute the largest mass termination of federal grants in the history of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal judge ruled on Thursday. 

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared the terminations unlawful, concluded that the DOGE staffers lacked the authority to make those decisions, and blocked the Trump administration from carrying out the grant terminations. 

“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote.

 So, awarding grants on the basis of certain characteristics is good. But ending discriminatory grants is bad. Got it.

This is Calvinball, and the rules will keep changing to benefit the Left.

Advertisement

Bingo.

Because it is.

Same vibes. Ignore it.

Probably. They know this, too, but they're hoping to run out the clock until the midterms or 2028 so Democrats can regain power.

Which is why judges are defending it.

Nailed it.

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement