You Can't Create a Weirder Candidate to Run Against Than James Talarico
This Federal Judge Just Blocked Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Obama Judge Busted for Having Loud Sex With Police Commander in Her Chambers
Black Judge Suspended for Allegedly Making Racist Comments About White Employee
James Talarico Once Gave an Interesting Invocation Before a Texas Legislative Session
The Media Have Cracked the Case on Who's Paying to Clean Up D.C.
DHS Head Markwayne Mullin Vows Law and Order Will Prevail Against NJ Anti-ICE...
Democrats Are Soft on Crime, but Hard on Law-Abiding Citizens
'We Did Not Vanish.' Greek Media Outlet Slams Christopher Nolan's Diverse 'Odyssey'
The White House Just Unveiled Aliens.gov and It’s Not About Extraterrestrials
Zohran Mamdani Doubles Down on His Decision to Skip Israel Day Parade in...
Spencer Pratt Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Late Endorsement of Karen Bass for LA...
'Pizza to Pews' Event Comes to D.C. As Gen-Z Flocks to Catholicism
Trump Currently in Situation Room Ready to Make Major Iran Decision
Trans Student Protected Over 9-Year-Old Girl by Massachusetts School Principal
Tipsheet

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

We're getting tired of activist judges undermining the Trump administration and its work to control wasteful spending, end fraud, and right America's fiscal ship. Countless judges have ruled against the Trump administration not because the administration is wrong, but because they don't like the President and his policy choices, and another judge did that with a ruling against Elon Musk's DOGE.

Advertisement

Here's more:

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “blatantly used” race, gender and other protected characteristics to execute the largest mass termination of federal grants in the history of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal judge ruled on Thursday. 

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared the terminations unlawful, concluded that the DOGE staffers lacked the authority to make those decisions, and blocked the Trump administration from carrying out the grant terminations. 

“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote.

 So, awarding grants on the basis of certain characteristics is good. But ending discriminatory grants is bad. Got it.

This is Calvinball, and the rules will keep changing to benefit the Left.

Advertisement

Bingo.

Because it is.

Same vibes. Ignore it.

Probably. They know this, too, but they're hoping to run out the clock until the midterms or 2028 so Democrats can regain power.

Which is why judges are defending it.

Nailed it.

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement