AOC's Comments About Black Americans Reminds Us Why Nobody Should Take Progressives Seriou...
Mamdani Supporters Are Turning on Him Over This Issue
AOC Pulls a Page From Obama's 'You Didn't Earn That' Playbook
Sheridan Gorman's Parents Fight Back Against the Democratic Party's Dangerous Immigration...
Ruth's Chris Puts Stake Through the Heart of Classless Culture
A Serial Rapist Who Terrorized Indianapolis for Years Is an Illegal Alien
Graham Platner Says Taxing the Rich Keeps Failing Because ‘Real’ Taxing the Rich...
Nick Shirley Was Asked If He Worries His Reporting Demonizes Immigrants—His Answer Was...
Marco Rubio Warns the World to Ready More Than Just 'Strongly Worded Statements'...
Hear Spencer Pratt's Perfect Response When a Reporter Says the Odds Are Stacked...
Greg Gutfeld Goes Off on Democrats for Their Moral Bankruptcy, and Letting Politics...
Mike Waltz Demands That the United Nations Crackdown on Iran's Violation of International...
Moral Clarity From Pope Leo
Trump Administration Releases Giant Haul of UFO Files
Tipsheet

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations

Another Activist Judge Issues Laughable Ruling About DOGE Grant Terminations
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

We're getting tired of activist judges undermining the Trump administration and its work to control wasteful spending, end fraud, and right America's fiscal ship. Countless judges have ruled against the Trump administration not because the administration is wrong, but because they don't like the President and his policy choices, and another judge did that with a ruling against Elon Musk's DOGE.

Advertisement

Here's more:

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “blatantly used” race, gender and other protected characteristics to execute the largest mass termination of federal grants in the history of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal judge ruled on Thursday. 

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared the terminations unlawful, concluded that the DOGE staffers lacked the authority to make those decisions, and blocked the Trump administration from carrying out the grant terminations. 

“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote.

 So, awarding grants on the basis of certain characteristics is good. But ending discriminatory grants is bad. Got it.

This is Calvinball, and the rules will keep changing to benefit the Left.

Advertisement

Bingo.

Because it is.

Same vibes. Ignore it.

Probably. They know this, too, but they're hoping to run out the clock until the midterms or 2028 so Democrats can regain power.

Which is why judges are defending it.

Nailed it.

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos