Calm Down About JD Vance
Caracas in Ruins: Up to 100,000 Feared Dead As Massive Earthquakes Rock Venezuela
Sorry, Mr. President, but the SAVE Act Isn’t Happening This Year
The Mind and Brilliance of Alexis de Tocqueville, Part Two
The Anti-Socialists Strike Back
A Time of Choosing
Trump: The Greater Risk Was Waiting
From London's Tennis Courts to California, Aggressive Taxes Always Disappoint
World Cup Visitors Get It; the Pope and Socialists Don't
The Socialists Are Coming for Your Grandparents
Despite the 54th Anniversary of Title IX, Men Are Still Competing in Women’s...
Fog of War: When Political Rhetoric Meets Strategic Reality
Trump Declares 'America Is Back' at America250 Kickoff
Four Charged in Scheme to Profit Off NYC Migrant Housing Crisis
Illegal Alien Charged With Stealing American's Identity, Bilking $800K From Taxpayers
Tipsheet
Premium

A New SNAP Proposal Is Getting Roasted

A New SNAP Proposal Is Getting Roasted
Courtesy of GOOD Meat

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is in the news again, this time with Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders creating a bit of controversy about a proposal to add hot rotisserie chicken as one of the SNAP-approved items, after removing junk food like candy and soda.

On the surface, this seems to be a reasonable proposal, but it opens up a can of worms. If we allow hot rotisserie chickens, why not other hot prepared foods? I know several of my local grocery stores have hot food counters in them that include mashed potatoes, macaroni and cheese, chicken wings, mixed vegetables, and soups. Why aren't those SNAP-approved, then, too?

As I wrote the other day, reducing dependence on government programs like SNAP is a good thing and a goal we should strive towards. SNAP was not meant to be a lifestyle choice. It was meant to be a safety net when employment and other economic concerns make keeping food on the table a challenge. And, as I pointed out, SNAP should not have to give recipients "happiness" in the form of candy, soda, or popsicles. Those are luxury items and for people who do not have the government paying their grocery bill, they're the items that get cut from shopping lists first when the budget doesn't allow for such treats.

Nor should SNAP be a resource for ready-made convenience meals, although it does cover frozen TV dinners. If someone wants a chicken, it takes 20 to 25 minutes to bake boneless, skinless chicken breasts. It takes about 45 minutes to cook bone-in chicken breasts, and it takes between 90 mins and two hours to roast a whole chicken. If you are a SNAP recipient, odds are you are not working 60 or more hours a week. That means there is time to cook chicken for dinner. 

Reading through some of the replies on X, there seems to be little positive reception for this news. In fact, most people are mad and frustrated. I understand that, too. After years of fraud, waste, and abuse in the programs and endless streams of social media videos featuring SNAP recipients buying steak and lobster with our tax dollars, people are fed up. They are tired of scrimping and budgeting to make ends meet while SNAP recipients eat like kings, brag about it, and then act like ingrates. The optics of making things easier for SNAP recipients isn't great in this political climate.

There are also economic considerations. I've noticed a reduction in the cost of soda and other junk food, and I'm not alone.

On Feburary 3, PepsiCo announced it was slashing prices on chips and Cheetos by 15 percent.

What will happen to the cost of rotisserie chickens, if we subsidize them? At Costco, a chicken is roughly $4.99. The cost currently ranges from $5 to $7 at other retailers. That will invariably go up if hot rotisserie chickens are added to the list of SNAP-approved foods.

And with affordability on voters' minds, that's a price hike Republicans literally cannot afford.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement