Pro-Hamas Students at CA State Polytechnic University Went January 6 With Police
If Columbia University's President Considers This a Form of Protesting, The Terror Camp...
Former Rolling Stone Editor's Biting Attack on the NYT's 'Adults' Piece About Speaker...
The Left Gets Its Own Charlottesville
Democrats Are Going to Get Someone Killed and They’re Perfectly Fine With It
Postcards From the Edge of Cannibalism
Why Small Businesses Hate Bidenomics
The Empire Begins to Strike Back
Harvard Suspends Palestine Solidarity Committee for Remainder of Semester
Trump Comes to Johnson's Defense
Head of Israel's Military Intelligence Resigns Over 10/7
RFK Jr. Just Got on the Ballot in a Key Swing State...and Dems...
Ted Cruz Insists University Professors Turning 'Blind Eye' to Antisemitism 'Should Resign...
With Cigarette Sales Declining, More Evidence Supports the Role of Flavored Vapes in...
To Defend Free Speech, the Senate Should Reject the TikTok Ban
Tipsheet

New Sanctions Are Also a Response to Iran's Funding of Terrorism

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer defended the Trump administration's new sanctions against Iran Friday and explained they come in response to Iran's recent ballistic missile test and attack on a Saudi warship in the Red Sea.

Advertisement

Further, Spicer noted the sanctions are in response to Iran's continued funding of terrorism.

"Today the U.S. sanctioned 25 individuals and entities that provide support to Iran's ballistic missile program and the Islamic Revolutionary Quds Force. These designations are in response to Iran's ongoing ballistic missile program, including it's ballistic missile test on January 29, 2017, as well as Iran's continued support for terrorism," Spicer said. 

Spicer also noted these sanctions have been in the works for some time and now was the correct moment to impose them.

In recent history the focus of Iranian sanctions has not been for funding terrorist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, which are responsible for thousands of American and Israeli deaths. Instead they've been centered around official and provocative state actions.

During Iran Nuclear agreement talks, the Obama administration refused to use Iran's funding of terrorism as a negotiating piece for a better deal and admitted some of the money Iran received when the deal was ultimately signed had the potential to go toward terrorism.

Advertisement

"The president was quite forward-leaning in advance of the nuclear deal even being completed in acknowledging that we know that Iran supports terrorism. We know that Iran supports Hezbollah and the Assad regime, and it is certainly possible that some of the money that Iran has is being used for those purposes, too,” former White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said last year.

When asked about a potential military response to Iran by the U.S., Spicer noted President Trump never takes anything off the table.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement