Michael Medved: The Nobel Prize Encourages A Dangerous Fantasy

Below is your personal RSS feed link, generated just for you - please do not share it!
https://townhall.com/podcastfeed/vip/townhallreview?m=

You can get your link from the Podcast show page, which you can paste into the listening app of your choice. For most apps, you can do this by clicking "Add a show by URL" or "Add by RSS feed". You can find app-specific instructions below.

Apple Podcasts
  • Open your Library
  • Tap or click Add a show by URL
  • Paste the link above
Google Podcasts
  • Tap or click Activity on the bottom right of your screen
  • Scroll to Subscriptions on the top and then tap the 3-dot menu
  • Tap or click Add by RSS feed
  • Paste the link above
Townhall Review
October 13, 2017
In another inane choice for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee selected an organization known as ICAN—the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. The idea of “abolishing” nuclear weapons is absurd, of course: if the world enacted the restrictive treaties proposed by the campaign, then decent, law-abiding nations would be disarmed while rogue states like North Korea and Iran would continue developing the nuclear weapons they might use with impunity.

Similar flawed logic underlies the current gun debate: just as they wish nukes had never been invented, so too many liberals passionately wish that firearms had never been designed or manufactured. But that’s a childish fantasy, since you can’t magically “abolish” a familiar, well-established technology, or prevent destructive forces from accessing it. As with dreams of “abolishing” nuclear weapons, attempts to regulate guns out of existence will leave the bad guys much stronger while the good guys became vastly more vulnerable.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.